Search for: "United States v. Edwards" Results 301 - 320 of 1,976
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2016, 2:21 pm by Shea Denning
Third, the United States Supreme Court winds up its term, invariably deciding significant criminal law cases the very week of the conference. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 7:51 am by Haley Proctor
Yesterday’s unsealed opinion in United States v. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 2:27 pm by Dave Maass
Instead, EFF and the ACLU point to a series of recent key decisions—including the Supreme Court decisions in United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 9:02 am by Eric Goldman
Background: State Sovereign Immunity The Eleventh Amendment to the Constitution provides: “The Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects of any Foreign State. [read post]
21 May 2010, 9:09 am by Kenneth Anderson
 Chief Judge David Sentelle’s opinion (joined by Judge David Tatel and Senior Judge Harry Edwards) opens: Three detainees at Bagram Air Force Base in Afghanistan petitioned the district court for habeas corpus relief from their confinement by the United States military.1 Appellants (collectively “the United States” or “the government”) moved to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction based on § 7(a) of the Military… [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 2:19 pm
The United States Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision written by Justice Sandra Day O’Connor in Grutter v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 2:19 pm
The United States Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision written by Justice Sandra Day O’Connor in Grutter v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 4:58 am by Amy Howe
  In United States v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 3:55 am by INFORRM
The Fourth Section of the Court of Human Rights today gave judgment in the case of Mosley v United Kingdom (Judgment of 10 May 2011). [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 9:59 am by Kang Haggerty LLC
Philadelphia, PA (November 1, 2023): A jury trial in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Shin Da Enterprises, Inc., et al, v. [read post]
10 Apr 2021, 6:40 am
On March 19, 2021, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in Ocegueda v. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
Tugendhat J was therefore bound by the Court of Appeal’s decision in Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v Bairstow [2003] EWCA Viv 321; [2004] Ch 1. [read post]