Search for: "United States v. General Dynamics" Results 301 - 320 of 912
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2013, 5:04 pm by Larry Catá Backer
(Pix from Great Seal of the United States, State Symbols USA) For American Independence Day I started considering the essence of American ideology. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 8:01 am by Richard A. Epstein
The current economic situation in the United States is recognized on all sides to be grim, and not getting better any time soon. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 11:33 am by Will Baude
Americans United for Separation of Church & State, Inc., 454 U.S. 464, 473 (1982). [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 7:08 am by Roel van Woudenberg
Under Article 125 EPC such principles of procedural law generally recognised in the Contracting States should be taken into account. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 7:13 am by David Pozen
And in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  In the first, United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 8:27 am
 The 2018 Research Forum addresses challenges to the international legal order emanating from dynamics of disengagement from multilateral governance, a perceived erosion of support by states and other stakeholders in existing international institutions, contestation of universal values, shifts in hegemonic power at the global and regional level, and the rise in populist, antiliberal, anti-institutional and isolationist political sentiments in various regions of the… [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 12:29 pm
Omnipharm - represented by the dynamic duo that is Henry Carr QC (11 South Square) and Tom Mitcheson (3 New Square) - unsurprisingly said that the judge was correct on insufficiency. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 7:22 pm
In the instant case, it would seem that reasonably prudent persons in the position of the defendants would see that their actions setting prices in the United States would negatively affect customers in the United States and elsewhere. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 4:13 pm by MJIL
Supreme Court opinion in Massachusetts v. [read post]