Search for: "United States v. Julian" Results 301 - 320 of 504
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2021, 5:30 am by INFORRM
The UK Government has relaunched the campaign to overhaul the Human Rights Act 1998 in an attempt to counter what Secretary of State for Justice Dominic Raab has called “wokery and political correctness. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 12:49 am by INFORRM
 Last week in the courts On 30 November 2022, Julian Knowles J handed down judgement in Ware v French [2022] EWHC 3030 (KB) awarding damages of £90,000, costs and a permanent injunction in favour of the claimant after an undefended trial. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am by INFORRM
Scobie stated that he had not included the names to comply with libel laws and asserted that the allegations had been printed in error. [read post]
1 Dec 2019, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
United States Democrats have proposed a new tough privacy bill which focuses on technology companies, the Guardian reports. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 10:59 pm by Graeme Hall
Mustafa Kamal MUSTAFA (ABU HAMZA) (No. 1) v the United Kingdom – 31411/07 [2011] ECHR 211 (18 January 2011): The European Court of Human Rights has rejected Abu Hamza’s claim that his trial in the United Kingdom for soliciting to murder, inciting racial hatred and terrorism charges was unfair. [read post]
21 Feb 2021, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
United States Forbes had a piece “Judge Tosses Out Another GOP Lawsuit Against CNN”. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 3:49 am by INFORRM
United States Just Security had a piece “Lawsuit against Fox News Over Coronavirus Coverage: Can It Succeed? [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 2:56 am by INFORRM
McKechnie, United States Air Force Academy Next Week in the Courts We are not aware of any media law cases listed for this week. [read post]
12 May 2019, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
Lachaux v Independent Print, heard 13 and 14 November 2018 (UKSC) R (on the application of Privacy International) v Investigatory Powers Tribunal, heard 3 and 4 December 2018 (UKSC) Bull v Desporte, heard 25 to 28 March 2019 (Julian Knowles J) Sadik v Sadik, heard 2 April 2019 (Julian Knowles J). [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:02 am by INFORRM
United States The controversial social media personality Andrew Tate and his brother are suing a Florida woman for defamation, saying she falsely accused them of imprisoning her in Romania, leading to their arrest there on human trafficking charges. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 12:31 am by Melina Padron
Forsyth, R v [2011] UKSC 9 (23 February 2011) Men charged with breaching sanctions against Iraq in 2002 fail to convince Supreme Court that the UK had no power to create a criminal offence under the United Nations Act 1946. [read post]
12 Dec 2015, 7:09 am by Elina Saxena
Ben also contrasted Donald Trump’s latest proposal to bar Muslims from entering the United States with Mai El-Sadany’s piece on being an American Muslim these days. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 11:59 pm
These former U.N. trust territories have legal systems similar to those of the United States. [read post]
26 May 2019, 7:48 am by Sarah Grant
The second covers the Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision in Pepper v. [read post]
26 May 2019, 7:48 am by Sarah Grant
The second covers the Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision in Pepper v. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 7:30 am by Graham Webster
The legal point that building on another state’s continental shelf violates UNCLOS (to which, it is always worth noting, the United States is not a party) is arguably very important but strategically secondary. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm by Schachtman
That goal ultimately came to have bipartisan support in the United States, largely as a result of Selikoff’s advocacy. [read post]
12 Feb 2023, 5:03 pm by INFORRM
United States Texas State Representative, Giovanni Capriglione, introduced a privacy bill to the state legislature which closely follows the Virginia Consumer Data Protection Act. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:09 am by Peggy McGuinness
First, there is the quite stunning concurrence by three judges of the Texas State Court of Criminal Appeals, which explicitly adopts the concurring opinion of Justice Sevens in the Medellin v. [read post]