Search for: "United States v. Levine" Results 301 - 320 of 774
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2014, 9:08 am by Tara Hofbauer
The bill also blocks certain transfers of Guantanamo Bay detainees to the United States. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 10:12 am by Tara Hofbauer
Wells provided dispatches from yesterday’s hearing in United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 12:31 pm by Benjamin Bissell
The review will reportedly examine how the United States engages with families of those kidnapped, its methods of intelligence collection, and its diplomatic missions to rescue hostages. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
Levine, 555 U.S. 555 (2009)), invoked greater ire from us than the atrocity in State ex rel. [read post]
12 Oct 2014, 7:03 pm by Andy Wang
” Additionally, Levine relies heavily on United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm by Schachtman
That goal ultimately came to have bipartisan support in the United States, largely as a result of Selikoff’s advocacy. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 4:55 am
Can Member States do so, or is it exclusively an EU prerogative? [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 12:23 pm by Nicholas Gebelt
              Section 108(a)’s Statute Of Limitations Extension Only Applies To Trustees And Debtors-In-Possession The Fifth Circuit case, United States for Use of American Bank v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
June. 13, 2013), holding essentially that, since those meanies on the United States Supreme Court aren’t letting plaintiffs sue generic manufacturers, we’ll change Alabama common law and let them sue someone else. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 3:00 am by Jay Levine
Not surprisingly, the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) and plaintiffs’ bar have been pushing for an expansive reading of the law so that more such sales would be governed by American antitrust law. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 10:46 am
Today the United States Supreme Court ruled in POM Wonderful v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 5:00 am
  Generally, government employees are immune from discovery in private litigation under rules first set out in United States ex rel. [read post]