Search for: "United States v. Singh"
Results 301 - 320
of 375
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2011, 3:43 am
They stem from the long-established principle of United Kingdom public law that statutory powers must be used for the purpose for which they were conferred and not for some other purpose: Padfield v Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food [1968] AC 997. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 9:04 am
In Thornton v Telegraph Media Group Ltd Tugendhat J had stated that whatever definition of what is defamatory was adopted, ‘it must include a qualification or threshold of seriousness, so as to exclude trivial claims’. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 4:22 am
News We lead with the Hardeep Singh case. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 10:49 pm
In Swaran Singh v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 7:53 am
For example, the IJ faulted Singh for struggling to answer questions about the date of his return to India after a previous visit to the United States in 1981. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 4:07 pm
On 17 May 2010 Mr Justice Eady stayed the action on the ground that it would involve an illegitimate inquiry into issues of religious doctrine (HH Sant Baba Jeet Singh Ji Maharaj v Eastern Media Group & Anor [2010] EWHC 1294 (QB)). [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 8:29 pm
Although the United States Supreme Court attempted, in Daubert, to draw a distinction between the reliability of an expert witness’s methodology and conclusion, that Court soon realized that the distinction is flawed. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 1:59 am
Put another way, how much illness in the United States is caused by foodborne pathogens? [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 10:21 am
"If they decide to hear our case, then the issue will be front and center before the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 2:01 am
But there is no compelling reason to introduce a “public figure” limitation in libel cases, as applies in the United States of America. (3) The defence of “truth” The burden of proving that what has been published is substantially true remains on the defendant. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 10:00 am
Girdharilal Yadav (2004) 6 SCC 325; State of Maharashtra v. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 4:01 am
The contrast with the approach of the Court of Appeal in British Chiropractic Association v Singh is instructive. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 6:33 pm
Hamdard Trust v. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 12:47 pm
See, e.g., Singh v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 11:00 pm
Detainees’ rights – the next round starts – SCOTUSblog: The United States Supreme Court Blog discuses the case of Fawzi Khalid Abdullah Fahad Al-Odah — a Kuwaiti national who has been a captive at Guantanamo Bay for nearly nine years – which is winding its way through the US justice system. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 8:03 pm
(IP:JUR) Overheated dairy warriors back in court: JN Dairies Ltd v Johal Dairies Ltd, Gurbir Singh (IPKat) The lady vanishes: the case of the disappearing debutante - IP Minister Baroness Wilcox (IPKat) INTELLIGENT SENSOR: a borderline rejection (Class 46) Sir Robin Jacob – Sir Hugh Laddie Chair in Intellectual Property Law, University College London (Spicy IP) (IPKat) United States US General US ITC holds second unnecessary hearing on… [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 9:40 pm
We posted: It is unsurprising, therefore, that more questions are being asked as to whether our judges are properly qualified to understand and rule on such controversial areas, even to the extent of looking more closely at their religious beliefs; something which is common in relation to the United States Supreme Court but until now has been unusual in the UK. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 4:45 am
HH Sant Baba Jeet Singh Ji Maharaj v Eastern Media Group & Anor [2010] EWHC 1294 (QB) (17 May 2010) – Read judgment The High Court has effectively thrown out a libel action against a journalist who claimed in an article that a Sikh holy man was a “cult leader”. [read post]
26 May 2010, 10:16 pm
The power to detain under the 1971 Immigration Act had to be strictly construed, and should be compliant with the principles laid down in Hardial Singh [1984] 1 WLR 704, as extrapolated in Tan Te Lam v Superintendent of Tai A Chau Detention Centre (1997) AC 97 PC (HK). [read post]
