Search for: "United States v. Watson" Results 301 - 320 of 522
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Oct 2014, 6:54 am by Brad Kuhn
For those of you interested in hearing from eminent domain experts across the United States on hot topic condemnation issues, I hope you’ll join us at the ALI-CLE’s 32nd Annual Eminent domain and Land Valuation Litigation Program. [read post]
13 Jun 2007, 12:41 pm
  Such a decision was the Eighth Circuit's ruling in Watson v. [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 10:27 am by Howard M. Wasserman
Arguments of the United States The United States appears as amicus curiae in support of Thompson and urging reversal of the 2nd Circuit. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm by Schachtman
Indeed, their brief in other places states their opinion that significance testing is not necessary at all: “Testing for significance, however, is often mistaken for a sine qua non of scientific inference. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 11:32 am
You can separately subscribe to the Pharma & Biotech edition of the IP Thinktank Global Week in Review by subscribing by email, or selecting ‘all posts’ or ‘Pharma, Biotech & Chem’ for the RSS option at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Mircera (Methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta) - US: Trial judge grants permanent injunction in case relating to recombinant erythropoietin (EPO) patent: Amgen… [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 9:30 pm by RegBlog
The Supreme Court has even stated as much in its 1985 decision in Heckler v. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 3:00 am by John Day
United States Postal Service, [985 F.2d 440, 442 (8th Cir. 1993)]; Kreppein v. [read post]
11 Aug 2024, 12:25 pm by Josh Blackman
Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc (patents) Joined blue state amicus brief in Shelby County, Alabama v. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 5:56 am by Justin Cole
Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) asked Rosenbaum and Watson what exactly the United States is doing to support the International Criminal Court (ICC), posing it as a question for the record and ensuring the two witnesses understood the scope of his request for follow-up information. [read post]