Search for: "Unknown Defendants A, B & C"
Results 301 - 320
of 486
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
This update discusses selected litigation, regulations / administrative guidance and pending legislation, on both the federal and state levels, in the following general areas of environmental law: (A) Water Supply, (B) Water Quality, (C) Wetlands, (D) Air Quality, (E) Endangered Species, (F) NEPA, (G) Mining / Oil & Gas, and (H) Cultural Resources.A. [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 7:57 am
In such cases, it is possible in England and Wales (and in Scotland and Northern Ireland), to commence proceedings against a defendant whose identity is unknown. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 3:30 am
I know that some defendants don't settle cases, either because (a) they or their counsel do not properly evaluate risk; (b) they or their counsel properly evaluate risk, but they simply don't care about the downside risk because the dollar amounts are immaterial; (c) they can't settle the case because the case strikes at the heart of their model of doing business; or (d) in professional liabiilty matters, the insured refuses to give consent to settle. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 8:48 pm
An overbroad injunction could be the basis for an FRCP 60(b)(6) Motion to Modify, as"any other reason" justifying relief from the injunction. [read post]
15 Jun 2013, 3:21 pm
Michal Freedman, and Leon Gordis, “Reference Guide on Epidemiology,” in RMSE3ed 549, 582, 626 ; John B. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 6:26 pm
In support, Respondent's counsel submitted that: (a) Relator's July 19-20, 1987 abscondence from a NSD, unknown to Probation before July 20, 1987, is a factor to be considered; (b) such abscondence is an implicit waiver by Relator of his right to a speedy disposition under FCA § 350.1, subd. 1, perceived as his implicit motion to adjourn under FCA § 350.1, subd. 3(b) up to thirty (30) days; and (c) upon Relator's absence without leave ("AWOL"), Relator's… [read post]
24 May 2013, 12:51 pm
Counsel responded that subsection (b) applied when the defendant's death was known prior to filing, and (c) applied when the plaintiff was unaware that the defendant had died. [read post]
1 May 2013, 5:01 pm
” The case relating to OT2 is therefore also not proceedings which correspond to A 105(1)(a) or (b). [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 4:00 am
” otherwise “. . . the court may be heading into unknown waters without a chart.[429] An example of an application of this reading of Free World can be found in Pfizer Canada Inc. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 4:37 am
The alternate email address for the account was jflocker @programpower.com, defendant's work email address. . . . [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 3:58 am
Goodwin v NGN (b) Which three letters have been used to anonymise a Claimant and also a Defendant this year? [read post]
22 Nov 2012, 10:24 am
For reasons unknown to this Kat, it was that comment which reminded her of the imperative need to inform readers of the latest course in the Reggae Reggae Sauce theft-of-a-recipe case. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 3:13 am
Subsequently, the Defendant terminated the said agreements and therefore the Petitioner sought to amend its plaint to the effect that such termination was invalid. [read post]
27 Oct 2012, 6:39 am
A copy of his affidavit describing his findings, opinions, and conclusions and the basis of his findings, opinions, and conclusions is attached as Exhibit B. [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 1:15 am
Elements (a) and (b) seem relate to the legal/illegal nature of the source of the p2p acts of download, while element (c) is apparently connected to the volitional element in the act of upload. [read post]
4 Oct 2012, 8:06 am
The utility truck became the convenient defendant given that the at-fault driver was unknown; however, since Tennessee is a comparative negligence state, it had rather minimal liability even if the issue had gone to trial. [read post]
14 Sep 2012, 8:34 am
W.R.C.P. 56(c). [read post]
14 Sep 2012, 8:34 am
W.R.C.P. 56(c). [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 12:16 pm
Indeed, HHS’s own argument as provided in the Federal Register (See page 82,711) defending their allowance of 3-digit Zip Codes in the HIPAA safe harbor de-identification provision relies directly on such a rationale. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 6:49 pm
Or I could give prepare to defend myself in court and give Mr. [read post]
