Search for: "V R Robertson" Results 301 - 320 of 414
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2009, 10:12 am
JIMMY DON YORK, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF REBECCA YORK, DECEASED AND JAMES R. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts On 28 to 30 January 2020 there will be a CMC in the phone hacking case of Various Claimants v MGN. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:30 am by INFORRM
As noted below, the Administrative Court will hear the appeal in the case of R (Chambers) v DPP on Wednesday. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 6:00 am by Kara OBrien
Richard Morvillo, a Partner with Schulte Roth & Zabel and Practice Center Contributor, sent along this alert he wrote with colleagues Jeffrey Robertson and Akrivi Mazarakis analyzing the NY Court of Appeals recent decision in Kirschner v. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
A recent ABA Section on Litigation publication quoted Professor Cassandra Burke Robertson, who observed that "the biggest question about Rule 8.4(g) has been whether it unconstitutionally infringes on lawyers' speech rights—and after the Court's decision in [NIFLA v.] [read post]
But that is precisely what Judge James Robertson of the San Francisco Superior Court appears to have done recently in Guardsmark v. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 9:05 pm
In opposing the request, the Justice Department on Monday had argued that, after the Supreme Court on June 12 ruled (in Boumediene v. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 4:00 am
(IP Whiteboard) FrangranceNet - Keyword ad and product shots case survives motion to dismiss - FragranceNet v. [read post]
9 Aug 2014, 11:14 pm
“[T]he offence was committed where the mortal wound was inflicted and the crime was complete there so far as the defendant was concerned” (Robertson v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 2:19 pm by Andrew Goldberg
" Indeed, the Second Circuit's ruling in the 2008 Cablevision case (Cartoon Network, LP v. [read post]
17 Feb 2019, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Canada On 14 February 2019 the Supreme Court handed down judgment in the case of R v Jarvis 2019 SCC 10 holding that a teacher who recorded students with a hidden camera is guilty of voyeurism, the Supreme Court has ruled. [read post]