Search for: "W. T. Grant Co., in Re" Results 301 - 320 of 733
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2016, 9:30 pm by rquintilone
As the California Supreme Court has explained, “A statute that merely clarifies, rather than changes, existing law” may be “applied to transactions predating its enactment” See W. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 10:45 am by Ron Coleman
Right — so long as the trademark in question is THE trademark under which they’re doing business, that is. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 8:25 am by David Strifling
Dep’t of Natural Res., 2006 WI 84, ¶ 18, 293 Wis. 2d 1, 717 N.W.2d 166. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
Readers should now know the answer but scroll down if you don't! [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 10:45 am by John Elwood
” That wasn’t so bad, by Relist Watch standards. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 12:25 pm by John Elwood
He added, “[w]e should grant certiorari to discourage this appetite—or maybe just serve green beans. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 10:03 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Also argued that court should grant relief as far as possible to the senior user in restricting TM like or large print uses on D’s goods of descriptive terms w/secondary meaning. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 1:07 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 Justification (2) doesn’t work, because it takes a lot of resources to enforce §2(a). [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
Oct. 15, 2009) (plaintiff’s burden of proving causation in a warning case “is well settled” law); In re Aredia & Zometa Products Liability Litigation, 2009 WL 2496873, at *2 (M.D. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 3:28 am
 One swarm may last for months up to well over a year, depending on the popularity of the work, and people may leave and re-enter the same swarm at any time. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 1:21 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Instead, the cost may be greater than the benefit if preliminary injunctions are granted routinely. [read post]