Search for: "Ware v. Ware" Results 301 - 320 of 590
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2007, 11:40 am
The style of cause is: See You In - Canadian Athletes Fund Corporation v. [read post]
26 Jul 2020, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
    The statement in the case of Ware v Labour Party is here and the statement in the case of Buckingham and others v Labour Party is here. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 2:09 am by Dr. Stuart Baran
Mr Ainsworth is happy, though: all that the justiciability finding means for him is that he can’t sell his wares in the US, which he had long since stopped. [read post]
17 Feb 2025, 12:33 am by INFORRM
On the same day, there was a preliminary issues trial in the case of Ware v Waters & another KB-2024-002122 before Eady J. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 4:01 am
 For those clients, I had been recommending Parallels, as Todd mentioned, although VM Ware's newest offering, Fusion v. 2.0, has me seriously leaning towards that application. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 12:20 pm by Lyle Denniston
  Those issues arise in the case of Perry v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 11:46 pm by Bianca Pietracupa (CA)
Moreover, given that the Travelway marks were deemed similar to the Wenger marks from the time Travelway’s wares first entered the marketplace in 2009, Wenger argued the accounting period should begin from the date of first use of the Travelway marks. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 11:46 pm by Bianca Pietracupa (CA)
Moreover, given that the Travelway marks were deemed similar to the Wenger marks from the time Travelway’s wares first entered the marketplace in 2009, Wenger argued the accounting period should begin from the date of first use of the Travelway marks. [read post]
The value of proper trademark management is the key takeaway in the recent Federal Court decision Milano Pizza Ltd. v 6034799 Canada Inc, 2022 FC 425. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 2:18 pm by Christine Dowling
Chief District Judge James Ware in San Francisco. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 3:39 pm
The defendants suggested that electricity was not a commodity because the Act used terms such as “goods, wares, or merchandise to refer to commodities, and these terms were not commonly applied to electricity. [read post]