Search for: "Waring, Appeal of"
Results 301 - 320
of 472
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2011, 8:01 am
Judge James Ware granted [Bloomberg report] Google's request to delay the lawsuit pending an appeal of a ruling against Google. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 4:29 pm
Ware’s move means a decision from the 9th U.S. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 4:15 pm
Ware’s move means a decision from the 9th U.S. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 3:47 pm
Because the case before Ware was not final and was in its infancy, Ware’s permission was needed for what is known as an “interlocutory” appeal. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 3:32 pm
District Judge James Ware. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 2:18 pm
Hit tip to How Appealing. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 11:19 am
” Because the case before Ware is not final and is in its infancy, Ware must OK what is known as an “interlocutory” appeal to the 9th U.S. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 10:32 pm
And if he or she didn’t, then an appeal would almost certainly follow. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 12:09 pm
Judge Ware didn't see it this way. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 5:24 am
Most DA's offices would just fight such claims tooth and nail.Fields is not eligible for compensation because of a concurrent drug conviction, but the ruling, if sustained by the Court of Criminal Appeals, will get Mr. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 8:10 am
Remarkably, the Prop 8 proponents are planning to appeal. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 11:07 am
Unsurprisingly, the Prop. 8 supporters who brought this motion to vacate have indicated their intent to appeal the ruling. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 4:20 am
He also set an August 29 hearing date on a motion to lift the protective order that bars public disclosure of the trial videos.UPDATE: AP reports that backers of Proposition 8 will appeal Judge Ware's decision that refused to disqualify Judge Walker. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 9:39 pm
The supporters of Prop 8 will appeal Judge Ware’s decision.UPDATE: NRO’s Ed Whelan has a trenchant critique of Ware’s decision here and here. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 4:34 pm
In its second order of the day, the District Court for the Northern District of California San Francisco Division, Chief Judge James Ware presiding, issued an order denying the intervenor’s motion for an order compelling former Chief Judge Vaughn Walker (now retired) to return trial recordings – an issue we originally blogged about here. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 2:20 pm
Judge Ware found their arguments unpersuasive. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 1:32 pm
District Chief Judge James Ware disagreed. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 1:25 pm
s validity is now pending in an appeals court, he had the authority to decide whether Judge Walker was disqualified or should have recused himself (that is, should have taken himself off of the case). [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 9:00 pm
Judge Ware said the appeal that is ongoing was the place to raise issues about how the trial was conducted as it unfolded. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 11:06 am
(Cordis) and Wyeth (collectively, Appellants) appeal the decision of the United States District Court for the District of Dela- ware granting summary judgment that certain claims of U.S. [read post]
