Search for: "Wells v. Thomas"
Results 301 - 320
of 7,414
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Aug 2023, 6:10 pm
In June, the Supreme Court effectively ended considerations of race in college admissions in their decision from the Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 3:11 am
Property, LLC v Butler County, OH, 2023 WL 3270901 (6th Cir. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 7:00 am
(Particularly following the Supreme Court’s 1983 decision in INS v. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
She previously authored The Legal History of the Presidential Management Fellows Program and Hansberry v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 6:48 am
Jacobson v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
This paper is much narrower—Sunstein is really unpacking some of the conservative SCOTUS bloc’s internal debates about the MQD in Biden v. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 4:18 am
Maybe that's how it should be during a crisis of that magnitude, I don't know, but it does put into perspective the Roberts Court's ties to the Federalist Society and the American Constitution Society as well as Thomas's connections to the very rich. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 9:05 pm
Well, by my count, since Doe v. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 9:12 pm
In Brown Shoe v. [read post]
5 Aug 2023, 3:42 pm
Hansen, criticized by colleague Thomas Berry on a different issue, reiterated that last simple truism). [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 12:56 pm
United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:47 pm
Indeed, on this view, 303 Creative might well have afforded the Court the opportunity to consider the question whether the Central Hudson test should be foresworn in favour of applying strict scrutiny in commercial speech cases (eg, Matal v Tam 582 US (2017) (Opinion (pdf) | Justia (2017) (Thomas J; concurring) (slip op, at 1)). [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 11:50 am
" Well that's for darn sure. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
If you want a wonderful summary of the inanity of Thomas' opinion, here's a piece for you.In Biden v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 3:32 am
August 3, 2023 - 1 PM: Mealpass, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2023, 1:27 pm
Young v. [read post]
29 Jul 2023, 10:17 am
" Knox v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 7:55 am
In Katz v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 3:54 am
Audemars Piquet Holding S.A. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 3:38 am
Alongside a claim for general damages, the well-known actor and producer is seeking special damages of over £10 million as well as aggravated damages. [read post]