Search for: "White v. Social Security Administration" Results 301 - 320 of 515
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Aug 2014, 10:51 am by Dennis Hirsch
In the past year the White House and members of Congress have proposed comprehensive privacy regulation, the U.S. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 8:24 am by Lovechilde
  The Reagan Administration sold weapons to Iran, ostensibly to secure the release of hostages, and then used the money from the arm sales to fund the Nicaraguan Contras. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 12:15 pm by Alan Z. Rozenshtein
Even some of Trump’s policies that are obviously inspired by white-nationalist anxieties—the push to limit legal immigration, the undermining of international alliances, the obsession with divisive culture-war issues—are not, strictly speaking, authoritarian, even if they are noxious. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
For example, some state officials banned the consideration of social or political interests when making investment decisions for state pension funds or have redirected state funds away from large asset managers because these officials claim the companies are prioritising political and social agendas over duties to clients. [read post]
31 Dec 2007, 3:36 pm
The Social Security Administration (SSA) announced in 2007 that it will draft POMS for annuities in 2008. [read post]
21 May 2009, 2:42 am
may enjoy this new change in preemption policy from The White House:The purpose of this memorandum is to state the general policy of my Administration that preemption of State law by executive departments and agencies should be undertaken only with full consideration of the legitimate prerogatives of the States and with a sufficient legal basis for preemption. [read post]
4 Jul 2007, 11:29 pm
Benn was co-counsel for Johnson v. [read post]
13 Nov 2024, 7:30 am by David Super
  Aging workers who will soon need Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid coverage were not persuaded that President Trump’s proposed fiscal irresponsibility could undermine that coverage. [read post]
2 Jan 2025, 9:05 pm by The Regulatory Review
” The dissenters predicted that the decision will likely impact “dozens of agencies” that use similar proceedings to hear enforcement actions and impose penalties without a jury, including the Federal Trade Commission, Social Security Administration, and the Environmental Protection Agency. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 7:04 am by John Elwood
  Thanks to Eric White for compiling and drafting this update. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 10:50 am by Gordon Ahl
The following speakers have already committed to speak at the conference: ▪ Eyal Benvenisti, University of Cambridge ▪ Heike Krieger, Freie Universität Berlin ▪ Silja Vöneky, University of Freiburg Call for papers: We now call upon scholars to consider contributing a paper to the conference. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The G&T test, plaintiffs assert, disproportionately benefits "privileged" white students and their "in-the-know" parents, who have the "navigational capital" to understand the admissions process and the economic capital to pay for expensive test preparation. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The G&T test, plaintiffs assert, disproportionately benefits "privileged" white students and their "in-the-know" parents, who have the "navigational capital" to understand the admissions process and the economic capital to pay for expensive test preparation. [read post]