Search for: "DOES 1-100" Results 3181 - 3200 of 14,022
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2018, 6:20 am by Lindsay Griffiths
Based on our research and interviews with 100 legal functions, here are the top 8 traps GCs have fallen into. 1) They are legal luddites Most GCs trained in law firms where the Dictaphone was the leading technology enabler. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 3:21 pm by James Hamilton
These transition provisions are designed so that restrictions on the charging of performance fees apply to new contractual arrangements and do not apply retroactively to existing arrangements, including investments in companies that are excluded from the definition of an investment company by reason of section 3(c)(1) the Investment Company Act, which exempts a fund whose securities are owned by 100 or fewer persons and is not making a public offering. [read post]
24 May 2015, 12:56 pm by Richard Forno
What does this all mean for the politics of meaningful surveillance reform? [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 7:31 am by Leslie Sammis
Read more about HCPTC rules (Section 7-1) and Chapter 2001-299, for Operating a public vehicle for hire without a certification. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 7:31 am by Leslie Sammis
Read more about HCPTC rules (Section 7-1) and Chapter 2001-299, for Operating a public vehicle for hire without a certification. [read post]
26 May 2020, 8:45 am by Sharon L. Lippett
  If the transaction is not timely corrected, however, the excise tax increases to 100% of the amount involved. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 6:27 am by Schachtman
A responsible journalist, or scientist, regulator, or lawyer, is obligated however to note tha “probably” does not mean “more likely than not” in IARC-jargon.[7] Given that all empirical propositions have a probability of being true, somewhere between 0 and 100%, but never actually equal to 0 or 100%, the IARC classifications of “probably” causing cancer are probably not particularly meaningful. [read post]
6 Jan 2019, 4:21 pm by Chris Castle
If I’m right about this, services are overpaying the matched songs with a share of revenue from the unmatched songs (in our example, 10/120 or 8-1/3 percent instead of the overpayment of 10/100 or 10 percent). [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 2:39 pm by David Cheifetz
The judicial pecking order does not permit little peckers to overrule big peckers. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 3:19 am
  Did you say $10 million (.10 x $100 million)? [read post]
15 Sep 2021, 5:00 pm by BKK
This article is for informational purposes only and does not contain or convey legal advice. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 6:36 am by Scott Schafer
This article is for informational purposes only and does not contain or convey legal advice. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 10:00 pm
GM was the first company to hit $1 billion in sales, and they did it back in the 1950s, when a billion dollars was a lot of money. [read post]