Search for: "DOES 1-8"
Results 3181 - 3200
of 32,289
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2012, 7:35 pm
§ 1245.10(a)(1)(ii) states that the physical presence” requirement does not apply with respect to a spouse or child accompanying or following to join a principal alien who is a grandfathered alien. [read post]
27 May 2008, 10:04 pm
This is not the total number of applicants, as the statistic does not include applicants without JDs and from foreign law schools. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 12:57 am
On 8 October 2010, the Registrar registered the assignment and Mediaquest became the owner of TM No. 741047. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 12:20 am
More specifically, the Board found that - whilst it is true that the Guidelines for Examination in the European Patent Office, G.VI.8, recite that the claimed sub-range is sufficiently far removed from any specific examples disclosed in the prior art and from the end-points of the known range as a condition for acknowledging novelty of a numerical selection - the limit values (end points) of a known range, although explicitly disclosed, are not to be treated in the same way as the examples.… [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 12:20 am
More specifically, the Board found that - whilst it is true that the Guidelines for Examination in the European Patent Office, G.VI.8, recite that the claimed sub-range is sufficiently far removed from any specific examples disclosed in the prior art and from the end-points of the known range as a condition for acknowledging novelty of a numerical selection - the limit values (end points) of a known range, although explicitly disclosed, are not to be treated in the same way as the examples. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 3:15 pm
Because Michigan Compiled Laws 750.157n(1) does not set forth a penalty for a violation of its provisions, the applicable prison term is required to be not more than 4 years. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 11:53 am
[8] Va. [read post]
30 May 2019, 1:21 pm
Op. 5 n.1. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 9:03 am
See, e.g., Endorsement Titled Policy Change Number 27(a)(1)-(2). [read post]
7 Sep 2021, 9:40 am
The Robbins case is a 101 case, and itself is rather interesting (link: https://casetext.com/admin-law/richard-allen-robbins-et-al-1 ) We have the issue of the conclusory statement that everything was covered: First, Appellant does not quote the full text of our statement. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 8:54 am
The first two categories implicate the Fourth Amendment, whereas the latter does not. [read post]
28 Jul 2018, 5:04 pm
” Id. at *8. [read post]
29 Nov 2015, 4:14 pm
” Id. at *8. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 2:50 am
It does not encroach upon fundamental rights and freedoms, and leaves intact the safe harbour for hosting in Article 14 of the E-Commerce Directive. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 1:08 pm
Please note that presenters will be asked to submit a draft paper of 5 000-8 000 words by 1 November 2013 to enable paper-sharing in advance among the participants. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 11:16 am
Yes, it sure does. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 11:11 pm
Please note that presenters will be asked to submit a draft paper of 5 000-8 000 words by 1 November 2013 to enable paper-sharing in advance among the participants. [read post]
23 Aug 2015, 6:35 pm
The regulations contain ratios of required mitigation which is tied to the quality of wetland or stream impacted (Ex: 2 to 1 or 3 to 1). [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 12:12 pm
So where does this leave Mr. [read post]
