Search for: "Day v. Smith"
Results 3181 - 3200
of 4,483
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Oct 2011, 10:52 am
Valladolid, Greene v. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 5:23 am
Our first topic of the week is Florence v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 10:11 am
He later achieved national fame for representing Homer Plessy in Plessy v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 3:18 pm
Abu-Jamal Docket No. 11-49 Issue: Whether the court of appeals properly applied Smith v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 8:12 am
On September 8, 2011, members of the United States Congress passed the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (H.R. 1249) with a vote of 88-9, without amendment to the House bill passed in late June. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 5:50 am
See Kolev v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 10:44 am
See, e.g., Parker v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 4:05 am
(See prior posting).Sherman v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 9:54 am
See, e.g., EEOC v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 9:36 am
Joseph Smith is such a predator. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 7:04 am
(The case is Smith v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 1:15 am
Mahajna v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 2481 (Admin) (30 September 2011) Detention of Israeli Arab activist Raed Salah Mahajna lawful save for 1.5 days when not told full reasons for detention. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 9:34 pm
The new case, Smith v. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 9:53 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 4:11 pm
The case is Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 10:54 am
By Michael V. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 10:00 am
Sackett v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 6:57 pm
Unsurprisingly, articles related to the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act signed into law on Sept. 16 are starting to show up:[2036 downloads] Predicting Patent Litigation, by Colleen V. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 12:30 pm
—Section 156(d)(1) of title 35, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following flush sentence: “For purposes of determining the date on which a product receives permission under the second sentence of this paragraph, if such permission is transmitted after 4:30 P.M., Eastern Time, on a business day, or is transmitted on a day that is not a business day, the product shall be deemed to receive such permission on the next business day. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
City of Redondo Court: U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals Docket: 06-56869, 06-55750 September 16, 2011 Judge: Smith Areas of Law: Civil Rights, Constitutional Law, Government & Administrative Law, Labor & Employment Law Day-laborer organizations challenged a city anti-solicitation ordinance that barred individuals from standing on a street or highway and soliciting, or attempting to solicit, business, or contributions from an occupant of any motor vehicle. [read post]
