Search for: "Defendant Doe 2"
Results 3181 - 3200
of 40,564
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2021, 11:52 am
§ 924(e)(2)(B)(i). [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 8:50 am
The defendants moved to dismiss the lawsuit arguing that the Federal court lacked admiralty jurisdiction to hear the case. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 7:25 am
Zhejiang Medicine Co., Ltd. et al, 2-11-cv-02389 (CACD April 5, 2018, Order) (Otero, USDJ) [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 3:03 pm
In the underlying litigation, the district court denied the defendant’s summary judgment motion on eligibility. [read post]
4 May 2022, 4:00 am
The court said in part:RLUIPA does not require a state to facilitate or subsidize the exercise of religion or pay for devotional accessories.... [read post]
1 May 2018, 7:25 am
The court granted defendants' motion for more than $360,000 in sanctions under Rule 11 and 28 U.S.C. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 2:02 pm
The defendant had sexual intercourse with a woman; 2. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
How does Cohan’s amateur tax calculations of “something like a $20 million payment” get him to $20 million exactly? [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 5:31 am
(Victim) is dead. 2. [read post]
14 Jun 2014, 1:10 pm
In Cole, the defendant pled guilty to a sex offense and was classified as a level 2 sex offender. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 3:30 am
Interestingly, the employer-defendant did not defend the failure-to-accommodate claim by arguing that the ADA precludes accommodations of underlying disabilities with THC synthetics, like Marinol. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 2:05 pm
The Appellate Division, Fourth Department does not agree. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 11:32 pm
” Therefore, routine governmental action does not include the issuance of every official document or every inspection, but only (1) documentation that qualifies a party to do business and (2) scheduling an inspection—very narrow categories of largely non-discretionary, ministerial activities performed by mid- or low-level foreign functionaries. 2. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 9:39 am
In order to recover under the CFAA, a plaintiff must show that a defendant caused a violation of one of CFAA’s provisions which caused damage to the plaintiff. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 4:06 am
Ferber, 12-80216-CIV, 2013 WL 12101132, at *2 (S.D. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 12:01 pm
The questions focused on the issues of (1) who has to prove knowledge under section 893.13; (2) does the statute require the State to prove that the defendant had knowledge of the illicit nature of the substance; (3) does the availability of an affirmative defense cure any constitutional deficiencies of section 893.13; and, (4) what other statutes, either in Florida, or in other states, lack the element of knowledge? [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 1:51 pm
”[2] The DTSA provides that a court may enjoin “any actual or threatened misappropriation . . . provided the order does not prevent a person from accepting an offer of employment under conditions that avoid actual or threatened misappropriation. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 5:57 am
Ct. 2159] (Hudson) [statutory knock-and-announce violation does not necessarily trigger the exclusionary rule].) ... 2. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 12:38 pm
On October 14, 2008, a federal district court in New York denied defendant pharmaceutical companies' motion for summary judgment after finding genuine issues of fact existed as to whether 1) the sham exception to antitrust immunity under the Noerr-Penington doctrine applied to defendants' filing of a Citizen-Petition to the FDA to block the approval of generic drug manufacturers' applications; and 2) defendants' Petition in… [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 10:03 am
Nazari, 2:10-cv-00279-WOB-JGW (E.D. [read post]
