Search for: "Does 1-35"
Results 3181 - 3200
of 9,549
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2021, 4:00 am
For this last week: 1. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 5:00 am
of Labor Standards Enforcement, Opinion Letter No.1991.06.03, at 1). [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 7:43 pm
The computer here does no more than the computer in Benson to limit the scope of the claim. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
For this last week: 1. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 12:53 am
IPBiz notes that neither Hamilton nor californiastemcellreport (much less Baker and Deal) dealt with the realities of the research exemption of 35 USC 271(e)(1). [read post]
21 Sep 2013, 7:04 am
Interpreting the precursor to Section 112(b), 35 U.S.C. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 11:47 pm
The district court held, however, that the dance-off was optional.The critical BPCIA language appears under subparagraph § 262(l)(1)(B), titled “In General. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 10:32 am
Directive 307 provides that the agency will examine three key questions in every case: (1) is there a measurable difference in compensation on the basis of sex, race, or ethnicity? [read post]
22 May 2021, 2:46 pm
Based on the above, I come to the conclusion that the preferment of an indictment on its own does not confer on an accused the right (let alone constitutional right) to a jury trial as now contended by the Applicant. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 8:12 pm
Patent No. 5,946,647 (the ‘647 patent) and claims 1, 2, 24, and 29 of U. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 5:01 am
Section 35-49-2-2(1) does not require explicit depiction of the acts or condition defined in these statutes. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 12:17 pm
Cir. 2003)(“Only assignments need be in writing under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 6:16 am
Antonelli, 35 M.J. 122 (U.S. [read post]
10 Dec 2022, 7:26 am
It does not represent an official position of the GSSB. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 2:22 am
The board considers that the wording of claim 11 does not introduce any limitation not already provided by the term "stable dose treatment" and by the specified dosage of 10 mg bid.2.3 These claims all relate to a further medical use. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 4:50 pm
After all as a result of the AIA, 35 U.S.C. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 4:54 am
§112(f) does not apply. [read post]
11 May 2015, 11:24 am
Thus, when a person drives a vehicle in excess of 35 miles per hour on a city street with a 35 mile per hour speed limit, that offense clearly is a violation of G.S. 20-141(b), and is punishable as an infraction. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 11:27 am
Cir. 2006).Furthermore, patents are presumed to be valid andovercoming that presumption requires clear and convincingevidence. 35 U.S.C. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm
Claim 1 of the first auxiliary request read:A single cell-edible oil wherein docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) makes up at least 35% of the oil by weight, said oil being directly obtainable from a unicellular organism by hexane extraction. [read post]
