Search for: "ENGLAND v. STATE" Results 3181 - 3200 of 3,672
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2017, 12:07 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
In the 9thCircuit, the IP exemption means federal IP; other circuits, and even California state law, include state based IP claims.Dogan: Need to argue on two levels: if yo [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 4:30 am by Merpel
  As the Guidelines and the Protocol state, public access to virtual hearings remains ever important. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 12:22 am by Aidan O'Neill QC, Matrix
”    Can he seriously be suggesting that Strasbourg’s authority and jurisdiction in the UK should be restricted to anywhere but England ? [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 5:37 am by 1 Crown Office Row
”    Can he seriously be suggesting that Strasbourg’s authority and jurisdiction in the UK should be restricted to anywhere but England ? [read post]
14 May 2013, 12:22 am
Like many of this weblog's readers, this Kat has long nurtured a fascination and deep admiration for the United States Federal judiciary. [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
On 16 and 17 March 2016, there was a two day hearing in Decoulos v Axel Springer Schweiz AG & ors On 11 March 2016 there was a judgement in the case of Monarch Airlines Ltd v Yaqub. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 7:36 am by Camilla Hrdy
It's an odd way to entice people to register...JL: Well, we borrowed incontestability from England, where it works. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm by admin
Not only was the statement wrong in 1993, when the Supreme Court decided the famous Daubert case, it was wrong 20 years later, in 2013, when the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved  Diclegis, a combination of doxylamine succinate and pyridoxine hydrochloride, the essential ingredients in Bendectin, for sale in the United States, for pregnant women experiencing nausea and vomiting.[16] The return of Bendectin to the market, although under a different name,… [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 4:11 pm by Lawrence Higgins
The guest speaker will be Lord Justice Robert "Robin" Jacob, Court of Appeal of England and Wales. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 7:10 am by Nicholas Pengelley
As an example of the usefulness of these, take the case of Abbott v. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 7:00 am
For those attorneys interested in finding out more about these issues or what their states may have to say, check out Russell Beck's article for New England In-House,  Marshall H. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 4:57 pm by INFORRM
Derbyshire County Council v Times Newspapers Ltd [1993] UKHL 18 established that the government cannot sue for libel. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 3:11 pm
In the Second Circuit, which includes New York, the factors for the test for confusion is that as laid down in the Polaroid Corp v Polarad Elecs. [read post]