Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 3181 - 3200
of 7,366
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2016, 2:06 pm
(on the application of Brighton & Hove City Council) v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 5:37 pm
Luis V. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 8:49 am
United States that its June 2015 decision in Johnson v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 5:01 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 7:30 am
Moreover, the employer’s motion to dismiss was denied (Gazvoda v. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 4:33 pm
Just plain-English reporting on the cybersecurity posture, readiness, and effectiveness of the company. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 10:11 am
Hernández v. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 3:00 am
Lord Sumption rejected this, stating that the directives leave various matters to member states to determine, but the domestic schemes were nonetheless part of a scheme for implementing an EU tax. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 6:32 am
In pemetrexed, the English court (Arnold J) granted a declaration of non-infringement (DNI), whereas the Germans did not. [read post]
Applicability of the 2015 Arbitration Amendment Act to Arbitration Related Court Proceedings: Part I
4 Apr 2016, 4:33 am
The Supreme Court in Thyssen Stahl Union GMBH v. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 3:17 am
Both the High Court and the Court of Appeal of England and Wales confirmed this in the recent Fenty v Arcadia litigation [the Rihanna case]: "[t]here is in English law no "image right" or "character right" which allows a celebrity to control the use of his or her name or image" [here]. [read post]
3 Apr 2016, 4:23 pm
The three trials are as follows: 5 April 2016, Umeyor v Ibe, 5 days; 18 April 2016, Undre v London Borough of Harrow, 2 days.; 23 May 2016, Theedom v Nourish Training, 3-4 days. [read post]
3 Apr 2016, 8:36 am
Ely State Prison, 2016 U.S. [read post]
2 Apr 2016, 4:43 pm
This is obviously sensible and is in line with the approach taken by the English law. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 7:38 pm
In Jedwards International, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 4:50 pm
The court stated that the object of enactment of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 was to make the anti-corruption law more effective and widen its coverage. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 8:46 am
States that confidentiality will be kept by the employer to the extent possible. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 5:46 am
The case, filed January 22, 2006, is entitled Walker v. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 2:11 pm
The granting of declaratory relief is pragmatic and discretionary and can assist in achieving justice between the parties (see Messier-Doughty v Sabena [2001] 1 All ER 275 and Financial Services Authority v Rourke [2002] CP Rep 14; see also Nokia Corp v Interdigital [2006] EWCH Civ 1618; [2007] FSR 23). [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 6:26 am
After Brown v. [read post]
