Search for: "Ex Parte United States" Results 3181 - 3200 of 5,135
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2013, 2:36 pm by Benjamin Wittes
As a way into them, consider two features that mark the United States’ legal approach to unsanctioned disclosures of protected information. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 11:00 am by Legal Beagle
The court was told that after the third report was completed and sent to all parties, the complainer, solicitor Ms Crabbe, stated that the reporter had not seen all the documentation he was supposed to have. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 4:00 am by Patrick McKenna
And whether you practice in Canada or the United States, the U.S. economy has a profound effect on our combined prosperity. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 4:20 am by Scott A. McKeown
Finally, as the Central Reexamination Unit (CRU) works through their current docket, the lower filing rates of ex parte proceedings may lead to significantly enhanced processing speeds, perhaps even rivaling that of the PTAB in the years to come. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 9:38 am by U.S.P.T.O.
Department of Commerce’s United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) today published final rules of practice implementing the first-inventor-to-file provision of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA). [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 8:43 am by Daniel Tokaji
  For example, in Ex Parte Siebold (1879), the Court upheld a federal statute enacted a few years after the Civil War, entitled “An Act to enforce the right of citizens of the United States to vote in the several States of this Union,” under which petitioners were convicted of ballot-box stuffing. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 9:30 pm by José Carlos Laguna de Paz
  Finally, in most parts of the continent, it may be very hard to find incentives for private investments in fixed NGNs. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 6:12 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
United States Int’l Trade Comm’n, 988 F.2d 1165, 1171 (Fed. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 7:52 pm by L. Gopika
He analysed the Delhi High Cout order that granted an ex parte injunction against the defendants in favour of Sony. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 8:03 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Answer, page 8.See also United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 7:12 pm by Wells Bennett
§ 948j), and that he is thus an officer of the United States who like federal judges and all other officers has a non-delegable and corresponding responsibility to safeguard the classified information that protects the public from harm. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
The ex-wife of former MP Chris Huhne denies perverting the course of justice and is pleading a special defence of marital coercion. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 2:12 pm by Steve Vladeck
The hardest question is what, exactly, the government would be seeking judicial review of at this stage… Some possibilities, among others: Whether the target is in fact a belligerent who can be targeted as part of the non-international armed conflict between the United States and al Qaeda and its affiliates; Whether the target does in fact present an imminent threat to the United States and/or U.S. persons overseas (although the definition of… [read post]
8 Feb 2013, 5:14 am by Benjamin Wittes
  On the other hand, Ex parte Milligan (1866) broadly proscribed military commissions against civilians from loyal states. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 5:14 pm by lennyesq
A full narrative of the habeas dispute and the Supreme Court Chief Justice’s response in the opinion Ex Parte Merryman is available on the Federal Judicial Center website. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 9:00 am by Mary L. Dudziak
Stiefel Prof of Comparative Law, NY Law SchoolIn general, in international law, the distinction between the state of war and the state of peace is becoming less relevant, or at least less determinative of the applicable legal norms. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 7:15 am by Amlan Mohanty
In an order passed earlier this year, the Delhi High Court passed an ex-parte injunction against the defendants for circumventing Technology Protection Measures (TPM’s) in the Sony Playstation 3 and other Sony game consoles.Given that the order was granted after the Copyright (Amendment) Act, 2012 was passed (although prior to notification), this is the first case to legally recognise the introduction of digital locks in hardware or software to protect copyright in India. [read post]