Search for: "Head v State" Results 3181 - 3200 of 14,880
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2015, 6:27 am by James P. Flynn
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit opened its October 29th opinion in Cardoni v. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 6:27 am by James (Jim) P. Flynn
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit opened its October 29th opinion in Cardoni v. [read post]
11 Jul 2020, 3:19 am by Jeanne Huang
This case is important on whether defendants located outside of Australia in a Hague Convention state can be served by substituted service instead of following the Convention. [read post]
23 May 2017, 2:32 pm by Anita Earls
That “heads I win, tails you lose” outcome would have been manifestly unjust.. [read post]
28 Jul 2012, 5:56 am by Charon QC
Not given to hyperbole or persuaded by political grandstanding – I am interested in the hard law behind the judgment, why the decision is so important for ‘freedom of speech’, whether the DPP was misconceived  in bringing the prosecution as solicitor David Allen Green has stated (in fact he went further and described it as ‘disgraceful’ in an interview with Head of Legal blogger Carl Gardner), and whether the judgment really clarifies the law for… [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 11:54 am
 are not told where they are headed, they do not get an opportunity to contact their families, and they do not know how long they will be on board. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 3:03 am by SHG
Subsequent to our decision, Respondents filed a petition for panel rehearing or rehearing en banc, and the United States Supreme Court decided Cavazos v. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 12:23 pm by Jeff Welty
I’m not aware of a case right on point in North Carolina, but consider the following out-of-state authorities: Joseph v. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 9:46 am by Amy Howe
  But civil rights groups are also watching another case closely:  Shelby County v. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 8:57 am
Rev. 480 (1990), has been cited for the proposition that the brief that Dawn Johnsen wrote in Webster v. [read post]