Search for: "In re Reader" Results 3181 - 3200 of 29,702
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Aug 2020, 3:25 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
lifehacker: “This week we’re learning how to be better readers with help from librarian and podcaster Margaret H. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 2:17 pm by Tia Sewell
Employment Announcements (More details on the Job Board) The following are job announcements of potential interest to Lawfare readers. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 3:07 am by Peter Mahler
The petition went on to allege: The Shareholders have not held an annual meeting (on the 15th day of the month of March in each year or otherwise) for at least the past two (2) years and therefore have not elected (or re-elected) a Board of Directors as required by the By-Laws, BCL §§ 701 and 703. [read post]
9 Aug 2020, 9:00 pm
"As a reminder to our readers, only those tenants that are facing financial hardship due to COVID-19 are protected by this Executive Order. [read post]
9 Aug 2020, 9:00 pm
"As a reminder to our readers, only those tenants that are facing financial hardship due to COVID-19 are protected by this Executive Order. [read post]
9 Aug 2020, 5:00 pm
Who knows if the courts will even be re-opened by the time it is published? [read post]
9 Aug 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
Every week we present the summary of a decision handed down by a Québec court provided to us by SOQUIJ and considered to be of interest to our readers throughout Canada. [read post]
8 Aug 2020, 4:23 am by Schachtman
Just as an example of the Navy’s continued monitoring of occupational health and safety developments from the academic, industrial, and labor communities, the reader may wish to look at the published Proceedings of the Third Annual Navy Industrial Health Conference (April 1951). [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 2:17 pm by Steve Bainbridge
When it comes to "stakeholder capitalism," however, we're in much... [[ This is a content summary only. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 1:33 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
But if you're following the process, the Austin Chronicle has had by far the best coverage. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 12:06 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
The New York state court then dismissed the complaint as res judicata, barred by statute of limitations, and for failure to state a claim. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 7:31 am
"Heinlein objected to Zell's lumping him with other writers such as Ayn Rand and Robert Rimmer; Heinlein felt that those writers used their art for propaganda purposes, while he simply asked questions of the reader, expecting each reader to answer for him- or herself. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 6:06 am by Florian Mueller
Few blogs have more judges among their readers than this one, so I wish to clarify something upfront: not only do I acknowledge but I fervently support the concept of judicial independence. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 8:30 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Fast Company: “Whether you’re using Adobe’s free Acrobat Reader or fully functional Acrobat, most of us can agree that while reading PDFs using these tools isn’t so bad, once you start trying to actually work with PDFs, things can get clunky quickly. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 9:46 am by Bona Law PC
  Many of the questions included quotes from anonymous third parties who felt a need to be on Amazon:  “have to work with them,” “we’re stuck,” “nowhere else to go. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 11:47 am by Rick St. Hilaire
In addition, the provision of this information to the reader in no way constitutes an attorney-client relationship. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 11:47 am by Rick St. Hilaire
In addition, the provision of this information to the reader in no way constitutes an attorney-client relationship. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 11:47 am by Rick St. Hilaire
In addition, the provision of this information to the reader in no way constitutes an attorney-client relationship. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 7:02 am by Elizabeth McAuliffe (Bristows)
  It is not enough that some persons actually engage in the art at the material time laboured under a particular prejudice if a substantial number of others did not (Re Glaxo Group Ltd’s Patent [2004] RPC 43). [read post]