Search for: "Kennedy v. State"
Results 3181 - 3200
of 8,224
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2015, 3:48 am
This ended up leading to a great deal of litigation to determine how expansive the definition of WOTUS was, with the United States Supreme Court in Rapanos v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 11:27 am
At Tuesday’s oral argument in United Student Aid Funds v. [read post]
1 Jan 2020, 2:43 pm
But what most struck my attention was Roberts's apparent belief that Brown v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 3:16 pm
Maryland, as well as to United States v. [read post]
14 May 2007, 8:03 am
Kennedy and Antonin Scalia. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 5:33 am
Like Chief Justice Roberts during oral argument in United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 3:02 am
Casey, and repeated by Justice Kennedy in Lawrence v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 2:53 am
Casey, and repeated by Justice Kennedy in Lawrence v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 1:14 am
Kennedy v The Charity Commission, heard 29 – 31 October 2013. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 1:14 am
Kennedy v The Charity Commission, heard 29 – 31 October 2013. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 7:05 am
Justice Kennedy, joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Sotomayor, wrote a statement regarding the denial of certiorari. [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 11:58 am
United States. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 10:09 am
The United States Supreme Court has moved a giant leap forward in LGBTQ+ rights with the latest opinion in Bostock v. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 3:09 pm
Kennedy, who was also in the majority. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 1:05 pm
Check the Wood v. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 8:13 pm
Here is how Justice Scalia described it in his dissent to the same-sex marriage decision (Obergefell v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 11:12 am
Whereas Martinez (and its sequel, Trevino v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 8:00 am
UPDATED: June 21, 2010 at 11:55 am Straight from the Broken Record department, the United States Supreme Court has again not issued a decision in Bilski v. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 10:35 am
The core issue in Indiana v. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 6:54 am
One such case is Bailey v. [read post]
