Search for: "Marks v. United States"
Results 3181 - 3200
of 9,189
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2011, 4:49 pm
A personal status did not need to be immutable or innate (Clift v the United Kingdom no 7205/07 July 2010 and A, and Others v the United Kingdom [GC] no 3455/05 ECHR 2009). 5. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 4:49 pm
A personal status did not need to be immutable or innate (Clift v the United Kingdom no 7205/07 July 2010 and A, and Others v the United Kingdom [GC] no 3455/05 ECHR 2009). 5. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 4:45 am
Yesterday the Supreme Court accepted one more case for next term, Oil States Energy Services LLC v. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 12:18 pm
United States, 371 U.S. 156, 168 (1962), or tosupply a reasoned justification for an agency decision thatthe agency itself has not given, Motor Vehicle Mfrs. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 6:00 am
United States, 406 U.S. 128, 153 (1972). [read post]
12 Jul 2006, 5:12 am
In CDS, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 3:43 pm
On March 6, 2014, the District Court for the District of Columbia issued an opinion in United States ex rel. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 12:20 pm
In the United States trademark common law rights are significant rights that cannot be overlooked. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 12:20 pm
In the United States trademark common law rights are significant rights that cannot be overlooked. [read post]
The court must consider the national security and public safety threats posed by concealable weapons
30 Oct 2021, 12:26 pm
New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 2:47 am
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard… [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 4:15 am
United States, the justices voted 7-2 to reaffirm the “separate sovereigns” exception to the Constitution’s double jeopardy clause, allowing federal and state governments to prosecute a defendant for the same conduct. [read post]
1 May 2019, 2:43 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 3:32 pm
The caption: SINGER MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS, INC.; LIVE GOLD OPERATIONS, INC., v. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 5:01 pm
See Groupon, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 12:13 pm
Williams noted that the United States Supreme Court in Missouri v. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 8:45 am
In Heinze v. [read post]
1 Nov 2014, 8:08 am
United States. [read post]
26 Nov 2024, 3:00 pm
We were joined by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), as the NRA appealed this ruling to the United States Supreme Court for the NRA. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 12:21 pm
Thus, to state a § 1983 claim, a plaintiff must allege two elements: (1) a deprivation of rights secured by the Constitution and laws of the United States, and (2) that `the deprivation was caused by a person acting under color of state law. [read post]
