Search for: "Paras v. State"
Results 3181 - 3200
of 6,183
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2014, 12:23 pm
(LexisNexis 2007) ¶ 108.02[3], p. 108-7.) [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 7:19 am
In R v Lord Chancellor Ex p Witham[1998] QB 575 he noted (at 581) that “in the unwritten legal order of the British state” it is “the common law [which] continues to accord a legislative supremacy to Parliament”. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 7:00 am
The litigation stems from one of the deadliest foodborne illness outbreaks in United States history. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 6:45 am
Pluripotent v totipotent So what does this distinction amount to? [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 10:01 pm
” The Litigation There are a total of 66 victim claims in litigation in more than a dozen states. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 8:44 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 12:59 pm
DISINCENTIVES TOWARDS INNOCENCE: A LOOK AT WRONGFUL CONVICTIONS IN THE ONTARIO CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM (Sean Robichaud, 2004)* * This is an older paper written many years ago. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 12:59 pm
DISINCENTIVES TOWARDS INNOCENCE: A LOOK AT WRONGFUL CONVICTIONS IN THE ONTARIO CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM (Sean Robichaud, 2004)* * This is an older paper written many years ago. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 4:36 pm
Following Stec v UK and R (Carson) v SSWP, it was settled law that the allocation of state resources was a matter for Parliament and the government and not the Court. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 6:36 am
He stated: “Dr. [read post]
13 Jul 2014, 10:58 am
., United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 9:53 am
" That, in essence is the core of the issue (nicely dressed up in the increasingly arcane language of American constitutional law) addressed in the various opinions in the Hobby Lobby case (Burwell v. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 6:47 am
See State v. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 6:30 am
” (Doc. # 1 at ¶ 7). [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 8:38 am
The CJEU today (in case in C-421/13, Apple Inc. v Deutsches Patent- und Markenamt, see here) confirmed that the representation of the layout of a retail store, such as the one depicted below, may - subject to certain conditions - be registered as a trade mark. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 10:24 am
Of note, the magistrate concluded that the record showed the OFCCP did not comply with the standard set forth in the DC district court’s 2000 decision in Beverly Enterprises v Herman (79 EPD ¶40,258) regarding the initial selection of BOA for review. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 10:24 am
Of note, the magistrate concluded that the record showed the OFCCP did not comply with the standard set forth in the DC district court’s 2000 decision in Beverly Enterprises v Herman (79 EPD ¶40,258) regarding the initial selection of BOA for review. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am
State of California (2014) 224 Cal.App.4th 1542. [read post]
5 Jul 2014, 3:11 pm
¶ 21). [read post]
