Search for: "Petite v. United States" Results 3181 - 3200 of 12,163
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Oct 2010, 7:39 am by Anna Christensen
Guarnieri (Granted )Docket: 09-1476Issue(s): Whether state and local government employees may sue their employers for retaliation under the First Amendment’s Petition Clause when they petitioned the government on matters of private concern.Certiorari-Stage Documents:Opinion below (3d Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionPetitioners' replyAmicus brief of Pennsylvania State Association of Boroughs Title: DePierre v. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 2:40 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
EPA (Cultural Resources; Trust Relationship) United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 5:10 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Supreme Court Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/sct/2017-2018update.html Petitions for certiorari were denied on 11/27/17 in:Town of Vernon v. [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 9:00 pm by Adam Schlossman
United States (09-1227) and United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 1:13 pm by Hunton & Williams LLP
As reported in the Privacy & Information Security Law blog, the Seventh Circuit rejected Neiman Marcus’ petition for a rehearing en banc of Remijas v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 4:56 am by Timothy P. Flynn
Jill Stein, in her capacity as a presidential candidate, and Louis Novak, in his capacity as a Michigan voter, filed a timely petition with the Michigan State Board of Canvassers seeking a state-wide vote recount. [read post]
20 May 2007, 10:10 pm
That rule, named for decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in a case called In re Fobian, 951 F.2d 1149 (9th Cir. 1991), had barred unsecured creditors from recovering as part of their unsecured claim attorney's fees incurred post-petition litigating bankruptcy issues. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 5:55 am
The United States filed an amicus brief at the meri [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 8:33 am by Kiera Flynn
”  As an example of government erosion of privacy, the board cites United States v. [read post]