Search for: "S. C." Results 3181 - 3200 of 142,057
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2024, 12:00 am by Lawrence Solum
Section C discusses the individual obligations from the catalogues of Art. 5-7 DMA. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 5:00 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
Employment- based All Chargeability Areas Except Those Listed CHINA- mainland born INDIA MEXICO PHILIPPINES 1st C 01SEP22 01MAR21 C C 2nd 15JAN23 01FEB20 15APR12 15JAN23 15JAN23 3rd 22NOV22 01SEP20 15AUG12 22NOV22 22NOV22 Other Workers 08OCT20 01JAN17 15AUG12 08OCT20 01MAY20 4th 01NOV20 01NOV20 01NOV20 01NOV20 01NOV20 Certain Religious Workers U U U U U 5th Unreserved (including C5, T5, I5, R5) C 15DEC15 01DEC20 C C 5th Set Aside: Rural (20%)… [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 4:19 pm by Whittel & Melton, LLC
At this time, they have not released other details, including the driver’s name. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 3:17 pm by Kevin Bercimuelle-Chamot
This is in line with preexisting case law, notably with C‑345/13, Karen Millen Fashions, [25] and [35]. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 12:41 pm by Haley Proctor
The district court dismissed AFRC’s challenge as moot. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 11:12 am by Allan Blutstein
Acting Associate Attorney General Benjamin C. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 11:07 am by Paul Cassell
Because "the reasonably foreseeable effect of [their] representations to the [District] [C]ourt was to mislead the court," their negligent misstatement violated Rule 11. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 9:57 am by Patricia Salkin
To advance his first argument, Bermes alleged that the County incorrectly relied on Snyderville Code Sec. 10-4-3.C.1.a(3)(A)(iii) (the “Site Grading Provision”) in the review of his request instead of the neighboring provision– Snyderville Code Sec. 10-4-3.C.1.a(4)(A) (the “Landscape Provision”) because the proposed work was to build a barn and not related to site grading. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 9:57 am by Marcel Pemsel
The priority period for patents is twelve months (Art. 4(C)(1) Paris Convention). [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 8:49 am by James A. Holt and Brianna Schmid
Under Cemex, when a union requests recognition based on a majority support of the employees to be in the bargaining unit, an employer must either: (1) recognize and bargain with the union; or (2) promptly file a RM petition to challenge the union’s claim of majority support by seeking an election, pursuant to Section 9(c)(1)(B) of the NLRA, unless the union has already filed a petition for a representation election pursuant to Section 9(c)(1)(A) of the Act. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 8:17 am by Kalvis Golde
The Oregon district court rejected the timber company’s challenge. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 7:14 am by The White Law Group
  Additionally, FINRA Rule 8210(c) mandates that no member or individual shall refuse to provide information or allow inspection and copying of books, records, or accounts as required by this rule. [read post]