Search for: "State v. Lord"
Results 3181 - 3200
of 3,609
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2013, 11:55 pm
By David RangavizState v. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 12:31 am
That provision is 104 words long, though admittedly it pales into insignificance when measured against the 621 words of s.4, the infringement provision of the UK unlamented Trade Marks Act 1938, a provision of "fuliginous obscurity according to Lord Justice Mackinnon in Bismag Ltd v Amblins (Chemists) Ltd [1940] 1 Ch 667]. [read post]
1 May 2011, 12:00 am
The common law has developed a law of privacy without a Human Rights Act in New Zealand, some Australian states and parts of Canada. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 12:49 am
The common law has developed a law of privacy without a Human Rights Act in New Zealand, some Australian states and parts of Canada. [read post]
3 May 2011, 10:30 pm
The common law has developed a law of privacy without a Human Rights Act in New Zealand, some Australian states and parts of Canada. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 1:34 pm
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton put Arizona on noticeceded US land to Mexican drug lords. [read post]
5 Dec 2021, 4:39 pm
Lord Rothermere has increased his offer to take the Mail, Metro and i publisher DMGT private, the Press Gazette reports. [read post]
5 Apr 2020, 4:47 pm
The Master of the Rolls and the Lord Chancellor have signed Practice Direction 51ZA (PD) principally in relation to the extension of time limits during the Coronavirus pandemic with immediate effect. [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 5:08 pm
On 24 October 2019 there will be a trial in the case of Lord Sheikh v Associated Newspapers before Warby J. [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 10:47 am
See State v. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm
Hogan (invalidating same-sex admissions policy), considered her vote in United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 7:40 am
Some of the social reversals included the lords of the house serving the slaves. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 4:40 pm
In Lister v Hesley Hall, the House of Lords formulated a wider test, holding that the principal is liable for a tortious act when that is fair and just on the basis of the “close connection” between the act and the employment. [read post]
1 Feb 2009, 6:20 am
Tornillo and NAACP v. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 1:18 pm
E.S.P. and Leaseco Group, LLC, v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 10:10 am
However the CPS guidance quotes "DPP v McKeown, DPP v Jones ([1997] 2Cr App R, 155, HL at page 163) [where] Lord Hoffman defined a computer as "a device for storing, processing and retrieving information". [read post]
27 Aug 2024, 7:26 am
In a recent United Kingdom Supreme Court case in FS Cairo (Nile Plaza) LLC v Lady Brownlie, Lord Leggatt (with whom the other members of the Court all agreed) at paragraph 148 held that: “[T]he old notion that foreign legal materials can only ever be brought before the court as part of the evidence of an expert witness is outdated. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 6:41 am
” “In support of this argument, IMTC cited two foreign (and therefore non-binding) cases in which no conflict of interest was found to exist: Jones v AMP Perpetual Trustee Company NZ Ltd (1994) (New Zealand) and HSBC (HK) Ltd v Secretary of State for Justice (2001) (Hong Kong). [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 8:54 am
It was only in 1996, in the celebrated case Common Cause v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 1:15 pm
Minister of National Revenue, [1975] 2 S.C.R. 248 at 254: Lord Guest in Carl Zeiss Stiftung v. [read post]
