Search for: "State v. P. B."
Results 3181 - 3200
of 6,784
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2010, 1:25 pm
The dollar limitation under Section 414(v)(2)(B)(ii) for catch-up contributions to an applicable employer plan described in Section 401(k)(11) or Section 408(p) for individuals aged 50 or over remains unchanged at $2,500. [read post]
20 Nov 2021, 7:29 am
³ The defendant prevailed in the trial court on a Rule 12(b)(1) motion to dismiss based on mootness only to see that victory slip away on appeal. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 3:07 pm
Gregory B. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 12:52 pm
Gregory B. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:00 am
El último presidente demócrata en haber nominado a un juez a la Corte Suprema había sido Lyndon B. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 8:49 am
(2022 Guidelines, p. 8-6.) [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 6:21 am
Case Name: Seteren v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 9:44 pm
Richard P. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 9:44 pm
Richard P. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 1:39 am
(p.9) Gearty sees no reason in principle why human rights should be subject to a species barrier. [read post]
27 May 2019, 6:17 am
Flourshings Plus, Inc., d/b/a the Tom Cat Bar & Grill, 2019 WL 1958284 (S.D. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 4:26 pm
In: Müller A., Schaber P. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 3:56 pm
See Department of Enforcement v. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 3:54 pm
A suspension is done "[b]y executive order stating the grounds and filed with the custodian of state records. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 8:35 am
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 7:57 am
State v. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm
The respondent's skeleton argument cites in support of that proposition R v Gloucestershire County Council ex p Barry [1997] AC 584, esp at 604E-F and 605 (Lord Nicholls), R v East Sussex County Council ex p Tandy [1997] AC 714, esp at 747B (Lord Browne-Wilkinson), and Ali v Birmingham CC [2010] UKSC 8; [2010] 2 AC 39, at [4] -[6] (Lord Hope). [57] And finally, Bury v Gibbons was a case in which the Authority had simply ignored a request for… [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm
The respondent's skeleton argument cites in support of that proposition R v Gloucestershire County Council ex p Barry [1997] AC 584, esp at 604E-F and 605 (Lord Nicholls), R v East Sussex County Council ex p Tandy [1997] AC 714, esp at 747B (Lord Browne-Wilkinson), and Ali v Birmingham CC [2010] UKSC 8; [2010] 2 AC 39, at [4] -[6] (Lord Hope). [57] And finally, Bury v Gibbons was a case in which the Authority had simply ignored a request for… [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 4:34 pm
" Br. of Amicus United States 19-20. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 12:50 am
Swift Jr., André V. [read post]
