Search for: "We Don't Judge - We Defend"
Results 3181 - 3200
of 6,888
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2010, 6:37 am
"I don't know why the Supreme Court wouldn't have added that language if that's what they wanted to do," he added. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 12:19 pm
As readers who use our No Injury Scorecard know, we're very interested in identifying situations where plaintiffs - and especially consumer fraud plaintiffs - get dismissed because they don't have (or don't choose to allege) a legally sufficient injury.Why? [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 10:10 pm
One would hope that prosecutors would leave well enough alone, but don't count on it. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm
We've also ended up writing this as something of a tag team. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm
We've also ended up writing this as something of a tag team. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 5:29 am
That remains to be seen.For employers, the case has two important takeaways: First, don't underestimate claims for attorneys fees in employment cases. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 4:05 am
One can keep asking why we can't get weapons from you. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 7:00 am
We still don't have specialized rankings for ethics programs, but I'm sure we all agree about what law schools are strongest in that field. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 4:00 am
The best solution, though, is a simple one: know the subject well enough that you don't have to try to say anything, you can just say it. [read post]
Update: Sex, Drugs, and 3000 Billable HoursDefendant law firm moves to strike 'scandalous' material.
18 Dec 2009, 7:08 am
In case you forgot the "salacious" allegations made by Alan Levy against Scott Haworth, here's a reminder, from the motion papers: Given the allegations against Haworth -- which the defendants don't deny, but do want stricken -- we couldn't help chuckling at the branding of the Sedgwick firm website: And right below this on the firm website: Sedgwick is an international trial and litigation law firm. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 7:20 pm
So if we're looking for a general problem of unfairness to defendants in our criminal justice system, I don't think going after deliberately false accusations--whether financially motivated or otherwise--is the place to start. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 3:24 am
But if we don't do it, do it continually and pursue it even though it may well be futile in any particular case, then we are complicit in the conviction of defendants based upon phony evidence. [read post]
12 May 2011, 9:25 am
” I don’t know what to tell Mrs. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 6:39 am
Institute of OM is not a defendant. [read post]
27 Nov 2008, 7:04 am
Here's the new rule: now you don't need a fake I.D., stolen routing numbers, or hacked identity codes - just scrawl someone else's signature and it's a two-year mand-min federal crime for "aggravated" identity theft! [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 6:35 am
Constitution requires courts to provide translators for all defendants who don't speak English, but also whether such a system is practical statewide. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 9:49 am
Proponents of harsher drug laws see privileged young men who don't deserve a pass. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 7:14 am
You don’t see deception any more after the 1920s-begun shift, and then “likelihood of confusion. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 11:43 pm
"We have been testing it a bit and we don't have any definitive answers right now," McCarthy said. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 11:00 am
At minimal exposure, people don’t really care. [read post]
