Search for: "Bounds v. State" Results 3201 - 3220 of 9,960
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2007, 5:52 pm
I thought CL&P blog readers might find interesting the recent opinion in a North Carolina state court class action, Moody v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:42 am by Bexis
 . to comply with state law while also being in compliance with federal law”); Strayhorn v. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 12:38 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
Vide letter dt. 30.06.2008, the Director General had specifically stated that Denel was to replace the rejected equipments.5. [read post]
27 Apr 2019, 4:35 pm by Mavrick Law Firm
A relatively recent decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit in Williams v. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 6:02 am by Giles Peaker
In a relatively short and quite brutal judgment, the Court of Appeal found: While it was equally bound by MA & Ors and Burnip, it was also bound by the way MA & Ors had distinguished Burnip, as at 71-75 of MA. [read post]
4 May 2017, 4:33 am by D
In this case the UT stated that the older case of London Borough of Brent v Reynolds [2001] EWCA Civ 1843 still applied and that although the FTT was a specialist tribunal and could have much greater confidence than a County Court in departing from local authority guidance they should still consider it and it must be a factor in their decision-making. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 3:58 am
Would Tonawanda have been disposed to argue that the second arbitrator was bound by the first arbitrator's award had it gone the other way? [read post]