Search for: "Does 1 - 23"
Results 3201 - 3220
of 15,459
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2013, 5:00 pm
(Univ. of Oxford, Research Paper, Working Paper No 23/2006), p. 7. [6] Id. [7] See G. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 7:53 am
Although that Rule does not allow general solicitation or advertising, it is not limited to accredited investors only (up to 35 sophisticated purchasers can participate) and the issuer does not have to take “reasonable” steps to ensure the accredited status of its investors. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 9:52 am
Novartis does notappeal that Board finding as it relates to claims 1 and 19.Instead, Novartis argues that the Board should havereassessed the unexpected results argument when itfound unpatentable dependent claims 8, 10, 22, and 23,and proposed amended claims 40, 42, 54, and 55.3 InNovartis’ view, these claims recite the “low dosage” limitationlacking in claims 1 and 19.At the outset, we note that the argument raised to theBoard below was quite… [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 5:01 am
So I keep debunking it.There are 5 Fridays, Saturdays, and Sundays in a July if July 1 is a Friday (So that the Friday-Saturday-Sunday combination is July 1-2-3, 8-9-10, 15-16-17, 22-23-24, and 29-30-31). [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 2:56 pm
But there is a Pennsylvania statute, 23 Pa. [read post]
14 May 2023, 7:07 pm
.: 3:23-cv-707). [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 10:02 pm
What is relevant to the current debate with Foster Farms boils down to the definition of the term “adulterated,” which is defined in the statute as: (1) if it bears or contains any poisonous or deleterious substance which may render it injurious to health; but in case the substance is not an added substance, such article shall not be considered adulterated under this clause if the quantity of such substance in or on such article does not ordinarily render it injurious… [read post]
10 Feb 2022, 10:30 am
Additionally, Liebert Cassidy Whitmore will be conducting a webinar about SB 114 and how to manage its requirements on February 23. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 12:45 pm
So does the 20-day clock start then? [read post]
22 May 2018, 5:20 am
Court #1 should not control the declarations of Court #2. [read post]
18 Jun 2016, 5:09 am
It provides: 1. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 6:18 am
By the same token, an interpretation of Rule 23 that does `change plaintiffs' separate entitlements to relief,’ for better or worse, would violate the Rules Enabling Act. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 1:10 am
Furthermore, that there exists an embodiment falling under the scope of the claim that does not show the effect is in itself not enough to deny inventive step. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 8:00 am
APC is waived if author does not have access to publishing grant; if author does have access, the APC is US$2000. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 7:52 am
Code § 8-107(1)(a). [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 10:34 am
For those who think the current system for selecting speakers for AALS panels yields the "best" (however defined) speakers, does the school-based data add anything to the analysis? [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 7:03 am
Thirty-two states are acting to pass laws or regulations to require sales tax collection by remote sellers now or in the immediate future: Preexisting prior to Wayfair: Pennsylvania & Rhode Island (both give retailers a choice between collecting tax or complying with notice-and-reporting laws) July 1, 2018: Colorado (notice-and-reporting only), Hawaii, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Vermont September 1, 2018: Mississippi October 1, 2018: Alabama, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky,… [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:31 am
Slip Op. 00352(3d Dept.,2021) the Appellate Division held that jurisdiction over a neglect proceeding does not depend upon the situs of the neglect. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm
These rules are enacted pursuant to the EPC (see A 23(4) and R 12(3)) and are binding on the BoA (Article 23 RPBA). [5] The basic principle relating to the conduct of appeal proceedings is to be found in Article 12(1) RPBA, which states that: “(1) Appeal proceedings shall be based on (a) the notice of appeal and statement of grounds of appeal, (b) any written reply of any other party and (c) any communication sent by the BoA and any answer thereto filed… [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 10:53 am
June 23, 2011), in terms of “equivalence”? [read post]
