Search for: "Fields v. A S" Results 3201 - 3220 of 17,265
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2019, 6:28 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
This time, the issue involves the speech rights of public employees.The case is Kennedy v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 1:51 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Moreover, contrary to the defendants' contention, the complaint "set forth allegations from which damages attributable to the defendant[s'] alleged malpractice might be reasonably inferred" (Caruso, Caruso & Branda, P.C. v Hirsch, 41 AD3d 407, 410; see Fielding v Kupferman, 65 AD3d 437, 442). [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 4:30 am by Ruthann Robson
  It is also invigorating in its accessibility: Nice’s language does not obfuscate or overwhelm. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 6:00 am by Terry Hart
Will the Supreme Court Review Oracle v. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 4:02 am by Charon QC
All of us remember the (in) famous Donoghue v. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 4:02 am by Charon QC
All of us remember the (in) famous Donoghue v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 9:49 pm by Charles Bieneman
  As illustrated at this site’s Patentability page, lower court decisions following Bilski v. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 2:31 pm by Greg Jordan
Reviewing the trial court’s dismissal of Pennington’s malpractice claim, Justice Ada Brown’s opinion in Pennington v. [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 10:07 pm
In short, the law on expert testimony on eyewitness ID in New York now appears to be: It is an abuse of discretion to exclude an ID expert when:- The case turns on an uncorroborated eyewitness ID; and- The subject matter of the expert's testimony is generally accepted by experts in the field and beyond the ken of the average juror. [read post]