Search for: "IN RE THE RULES OF CONTINUING LEGAL"
Results 3201 - 3220
of 15,743
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2017, 5:00 am
Court rulings interpreting Title VII as encompassing sexual orientation and gender identity are still not definitive, “but you’re starting to see that more and more,” he says. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 5:14 pm
Discussion According to the July 21, 2017 Reuters article about the Tribunal’s ruling, had it been allowed to proceed, the case “would have been the largest and most complex in British legal history” and would have “tested the limits” of the new Consumer Rights Act. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 8:29 pm
The courts are going to have to decide, and they’re going to set a precedent for our autonomous future. [read post]
26 Aug 2024, 12:51 pm
You can use a promotional email to initially announce a new legal niche or event and then continue to promote it in your newsletters. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 2:36 pm
Limit risk associated with re-identification by tracking technological advancements, committing not to re-identify data, and contractually prohibiting vendors from re-identifying data. 2. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 4:09 am
Court says: If these are the only reason you’re obese, and if they haven’t killed you yet, then you don’t have a disability. [read post]
22 Mar 2014, 8:51 am
The Supreme Court ruled in Province of North Cotabato v. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 5:59 am
You’re welcome. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 3:31 pm
You know, we don't have a rule in the Constitution of just one clause per case. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 7:11 am
The crowdfunding industry has continued to grow and prosper. [read post]
21 May 2024, 7:55 am
There are some other significant features of the rule. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 6:42 am
But it certainly changes the conversation about why the commissions continue to raise fairness, effectiveness, and legality concerns–and, candidly, makes at least some of the objections harder to maintain. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 6:43 am
If you have questions about your legal rights, you should consult with your own legal counsel (i.e., barrister, solicitor, lawyer, and/or attorney). [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 10:34 am
We’re wondering what is the point in appealing and continuing in this charade of the courts in this country which are warped in favour of protecting the police. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 9:57 am
But most of all this view asserts something about the nature of “inherent” self-defense in customary international law: irrespective of the Charter’s language about “armed attack,” customary law has always recognized, and continues to recognize now, that states embrace a wider list of legal and legitimate casus belli than simply an armed attack upon a state’s territory. [read post]
20 Feb 2021, 9:46 am
They are neglecting the ICRC rules. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 4:10 am
Federal RICO ruling, Jackson v. [read post]
5 Aug 2018, 2:05 pm
The same is true for legal innovation. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 5:11 am
BashmanThe Legal IntelligencerJune 14, 2010Upon Further ReviewThe Legal Intelligencer recently hosted a Continuing Legal Education course titled "Winning Litigation Strategies" at which I was fortunate to have been one of the speakers in that program's appellate litigation segment. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 4:50 pm
”[1] The asserted legal authority for these PLI warrants’[2] was SCA § 2703(c)(1)(A). [read post]
