Search for: "In re David T." Results 3201 - 3220 of 13,629
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2018, 2:12 pm by Schachtman
Public Health Pol’y 4 (2018). 4 See, e.g., In re Silica Products Liab. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 3:11 am
Jersey Boardwalk Franchising Co., Opposition No. 91219067 [Opposition to registration of the mark shown below right for "restaurant services" on the ground of likelihood of confusion in view of the registered mark shown below left, registered for highway maintenance services and information services, and used by licensees for ancillary goods].February 28, 2018 - 11 AM: In re David Copeland-Smith, Serial Nos. 85498107 [Section 2(d) refusal of BEAST MODE SOCCER for… [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 4:34 am
They can't act like they're talking within a group that all agree they hate Donald Trump. [read post]
28 Jan 2018, 9:01 pm by Jim Sedor
Ethics Federal: “Arguments Begin in Emoluments Suit against Trump” by David Fahenthold and Jonathan O’Connell for Washington Post Federal: “Patrick Meehan Won’t Seek Re-election in Pennsylvania” by Kenneth Vogel and Katie Rogers for New York Times Federal: “Trump Groups Raised Millions, Then Paid It Out to Loyalists and a Trump Hotel” by Kenneth Vogel and Rachel Shorey (New York Times) for Las Vegas Sun Federal: “Trump… [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 9:30 pm by Sarah Madigan
In an article for the University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, David A. [read post]
20 Jan 2018, 4:53 am by David Post
For me, though, it was love at first sight (h/t to my Con Law I prof, Louis Michael Seidman, who gave us a really superlative introduction to the doctrines many delights), and, love being blind, I've always managed to overlook and forgive the doctine's many flaws. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 2:18 am by Tessa Shepperson
You don’t need to re-serve existing tenants, unless they renew their tenancy, but the new booklet should be given to all new tenants. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 4:53 am by David Post
For me, though, it was love at first sight (h/t to my Con Law I prof, Louis Michael Seidman, who gave us a really superlative introduction to the doctrines many delights), and, love being blind, I've always managed to overlook and forgive the doctine's many flaws. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 11:34 am by Shea Denning
Reed responded, “‘I’m not saying you’re not,’” to which Lamm replied, “‘You don’t know me, don’t judge me. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 8:00 am by Zuri Blackmon
I’ve experienced the simply reply from the appeal officer that he/she is satisfied that the IRS has taken all required steps, and there isn’t any other thing to talk about. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 5:00 am by Anonymous
It is Creative Commons licensed for re-use in teaching materials and elsewhere. [read post]