Search for: "Marks v. United States"
Results 3201 - 3220
of 9,189
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2012, 8:20 am
The General Court's decision On similarity of the marks, the General Court upheld the reasoning of the Board of Appeal and stated that all of the marks used the prefix "bo to" and that in Botox's case "bo tox" did not stand for 'botulinum' and 'toxin". [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 6:42 am
Today, the Court will hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 5:02 pm
(“Arctic Cat”) appeals from a judgmentof the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida that Arctic Cat is not entitled to recover precomplaint damages from Bombardier Recreational Products Inc. [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 6:11 am
at 126 (citation and quotation marks omitted). [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 10:38 am
Mark your calendars.November 8 - TexasJuly 7 - GeorgiaNovember 8, 2010That's the date Judge Kevin Fine, presiding over the Texas death penalty case State of Texas v. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 11:43 am
Davis and Helvering v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 7:10 am
One v. [read post]
27 Dec 2020, 7:55 am
United States, the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that public display occurs "each time an individual computer user accesses the relevant page on a website that displays the work. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 12:07 am
United States, courts reasoned that large company-wide statistical disparities had to come from somewhere. [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 5:37 am
The United States Supreme Court in Dastar Corp. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 6:42 am
Gameologist Group, LLC v. [read post]
24 Dec 2015, 6:57 am
Unfortunately, pedestrians are injured and killed throughout the United States every year. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 8:21 am
While the cameras were then sold in the United States, and Nikon Corporation and another co-defendant “maintain websites in English targeting the United States” and Delaware, Sendai itself conducted no business in the United States. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 7:44 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 10:29 pm
" - the constitutional requirement originally recognized by the Supreme Court in the Trade-Mark Cases. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 1:00 pm
In United States v. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 6:42 am
Quoting United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 2:48 am
The ImmigrationProf Blog is hosting an online symposium on United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:38 pm
See Rogers v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:38 pm
See Rogers v. [read post]
