Search for: "Reiter v Reiter" Results 3201 - 3220 of 6,282
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2015, 12:21 pm by John Jascob
On rebuttal, Gorman reiterated that a trader may wish to bid up over the market ask price in order to get a large block of stock. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 1:47 pm by Howard Knopf
The Board has rendered 14 decisions between 1999  and 2014 – all but one of which (now pending in the SCC in CBC v SODRAC) are “interim” TOTAL NUMBER OF TARIFFS CERTIFIED 74 This is an inflated number, and reflects a number of minor “redeterminations” and other less than significant events. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 3:31 pm by Stephen Bilkis
We reiterate, however, that each case is fact specific (see, People v West, 271 AD2d 806; People v Brooks, 270 AD2d 206, lv denied 95 NY2d 794; People v Parr, 155 AD2d 945, lv denied 75 NY2d 870 [all holding that a defendant who performs a significant act of domestic violence against a mother in the presence of a child is guilty of endangering the welfare of that child]). [95 N.Y.2d 374] With respect to defendant's appeal, the issues presented either lack… [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 2:30 pm
 Or whether Judge Tallman's approach has a solution to the ten lawyer/lengthy brief hypothetical which seems to raise identical issues to those here.To reiterate:  Judge Tallman definitely gets an A.But can we make it an A+ without changing the result? [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 12:40 am
Circling back to the Coke's marks, we reiterate the assumption that the hashtag serves to direct consumer traffic to Coca-Cola’s social networks. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 10:53 am
However, given the manner in which the trial court recently acquitted 16 persons accused of committing the Hashimpura massacre in 1987, it is necessary to also reiterate the norms and standards laid down by the law regarding the use of force by the police against civilians and the steps that need to be taken for ensuring a scientific and impartial investigation of such incidents. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 4:55 pm by INFORRM
(Chase v News Group Newspapers Ltd) Having earlier observed that cases in the Lewis v Daily Telegraph mould needed to be read in the light of the plurality of the High Court in Favell v Queensland Newspapers, Justice Martin detected the presence of “a significant amount of ‘smoke’,” from the front page. [read post]