Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court" Results 3201 - 3220 of 9,084
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Oct 2018, 9:30 am by Dennis Crouch
By Dennis Crouch Corning Optical Communications v. [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 7:51 am by Charlotte Garden
An observer who had nothing to go on except the back-and-forth in Mount Lemmon Fire District v. [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
"* An individual acts "pro se" by serving as his or her own attorney in a judicial or quasi-judicial proceeding.** Razzano v Remsenburg-Speonk UFSD, 41 N.Y.S.3d 72The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/19590bd6-7c4a-43be-82e8-0d96d8dd64f5/1/doc/17-775_so.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/19590bd6-7c4a-43be-82e8-0d96d8dd64f5/1/hilite/ [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 8:37 am by psmoeller
In so ruling, the Court reaffirmed the constitutional right to have an abortion first established in Roe v. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 6:00 am by Beth Graham
Texas’ Eighth District Court of Appeals in El Paso has affirmed a trial court’s order stating two companies did not agree to exclusively arbitrate their claims against one another under Delaware law. [read post]
29 Sep 2018, 4:30 pm by Giles Peaker
She was disputing (and in the judicial review proceedings continues to dispute) the first respondent’s proposition that she was a trespasser. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 4:34 pm by Jeremy Gordon
Srinivasan challenges Phillips’ third contention, suggesting that United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 1:08 pm by Deborah Heller
Cases with argument dates in October: Mount Lemmon Fire District v. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 11:55 am by Jessica Smith
Next, the court held that the district court abused its discretion by requiring an affidavit-based process for determining indigency in place of the Standing Order’s judicial bail hearing procedure. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 9:11 am by Eugene Volokh
Even if there is some confidential material, both state law and First Amendment law generally calls for it to be redacted (with as few redactions as possible), rather than for the whole case to be sealed top to bottom: "The public cannot monitor judicial performance adequately if the records of judicial proceedings are secret. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:03 pm by Schachtman
Corp., 788 F.2d 741, 745 (11th Cir. 1986) (reviewing a district court’s decision deciding not to require the use of epidemiological evidence and instead allowing expert testimony). [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 2:10 pm by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
We have pending on appeal before the Third District Court of Appeal the question whether a homeowner’s association is liable under the non-delegable duty doctrine for the negligence of a third party. [read post]