Search for: "State v. Means" Results 3201 - 3220 of 61,261
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2016, 1:47 am by Tom Pritchard
Summary On 23 June 2016 the Supreme Court will hear the appeal of Manolete Partners plc v Hastings Borough Council. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 7:04 am by Derek T. Muller
That means there are at least 10 days (and, of course, more if the requests are submitted earlier) for auditors to process, to contact voters, and for voters to correct.The matter was litigated in state court, but Iowa courts, apparently, have a “lock step” approach, which means they use federal cases to interpret similar state law provisions on voting rights. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 5:40 am by Alan Rozenshtein
A member of the panel then states that, in her opinion, a Bivens cause of action does not require congressional action, and that the government’s argument relies on United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 4:48 am
But this does not mean that reform cannot be achieved. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 1:35 am by INFORRM
In The Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor v TLU & Anor [2018] EWCA Civ 2217 the Court of Appeal, was asked to review one aspect of Mr Justice Mitting’s decision in TLT & Ors v The Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor [2016] EWHC 2217 (QB). [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 2:41 pm by Phil Cave
NMCCA dismisses a conviction for consensual homosexual sodomy in United States v. [read post]