Search for: "TAYLOR v TAYLOR"
Results 3201 - 3220
of 4,755
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2011, 6:53 am
On Tuesday the Court issued opinions in Ashcroft v. al-Kidd, the material-witness case, and Global-Tech Appliances, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 4:16 pm
Taylor ... [read post]
31 May 2011, 4:47 am
See, Taylor v. [read post]
30 May 2011, 5:19 pm
Accordingly, the use of the word “may” suggests that either party negotiating a collective bargaining agreement could decline to negotiate an alternative to a statutory disciplinary procedure but may elect to do so, making any demand for an alternative to a statutory disciplinary procedure a permissive subject of collective bargaining within the meaning of the Taylor Law. [read post]
29 May 2011, 5:20 pm
I’m not a lawyer, so let’s be very clear about that, but I’m about to tell you how the law has always worked in this country, as far as I have understood it. [read post]
29 May 2011, 11:38 am
Becker's update also included Welk v. [read post]
28 May 2011, 2:04 pm
The case IWOI, LLC v. [read post]
28 May 2011, 5:39 am
As he said in A v B, “The [public figure] should recognise that because of his public position he must expect and accept that his actions will be more closely scrutinised by the media. [read post]
27 May 2011, 6:40 am
Niri Shan and Adam Rendle are media lawyers at Taylor Wessing LLP [read post]
25 May 2011, 5:46 am
Taylor, 2011 Tenn. [read post]
23 May 2011, 12:41 pm
Taylor, 509 F.3d 839, 841 (7th Cir. 2007) ("Taylor I"); United States v. [read post]
22 May 2011, 9:22 pm
Taylor v. [read post]
22 May 2011, 8:28 am
Hoang v. [read post]
22 May 2011, 4:03 am
NoveltyThe test for determining whether the invention lacks novelty is the ‘reverse infringement test’ as set out in Meyers Taylor Pty Ltd v Vicarr Industries Ltd (1977) 137 CLR 228 where Aickin J stated (at 235):‘The basic test for anticipation or want of novelty is the same as that for infringement and generally one can properly ask whether the alleged anticipation would, if the patent were valid, constitute an infringement’. [read post]
21 May 2011, 7:55 am
United States v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 9:43 am
The executor of the estate must, at all times, act with the best interests of the estate in mind, Taylor v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 4:38 am
"The Garner Transcripts: That v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 2:59 pm
McBride – Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP Elizabeth M. [read post]
19 May 2011, 7:22 am
V argas, Represe nting No ncitizen Crim inal Defe ndants in New Yo rk State , 3d. [read post]
17 May 2011, 7:23 am
Both aggregation and disaggregation of outcomes poses difficult problems for statistical analysis, and for epidemiology. [read post]
