Search for: "United States v. Marks" Results 3201 - 3220 of 9,491
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2011, 11:12 pm by Marie Louise
552/09 P, Ferrero SpA v OHIM, Tirol Milch reg.Gen.mbH, Innsbruck (Class 46) (IPKat) Mark your calendar right! [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 8:57 am by Lindsay See
” It has been used consistently and exclusively for the secular purpose of honoring those who died fighting for the United States. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 12:02 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Florida, the United States Supreme Court rejected this principle, and held that juveniles categorically could not be sentenced to life without parole for crimes other than homicide. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 7:37 am by Steve Baird
Here’s a question, do you think the Wawa brand satisfies the now decade old requirement in the federal dilution law that Wawa is “widely recognized by the general consuming public of the United States“? [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 11:18 am by JD Hull
Stern predicts that, in a new Florida case before Supreme Court, the Court's holding in Citizens United v. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 6:50 am by jonathanturley
For JDPI or similarly situated trademark holders to obtain a different outcome, they must seek relief before the United States Supreme Court or the United States Congress. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 10:01 am by Kevin Johnson
Holder, the United States seeks to remove from the United States a lawful permanent resident who has lived here since 1974, because he was convicted of voluntary manslaughter in 1989. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 6:36 am by cassieq
Ruiz, Jr. was the first Hispanic attorney to argue before the United States Supreme Court in Buck v. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 5:02 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
(“Arctic Cat”) appeals from a judgmentof the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida that Arctic Cat is not entitled to recover precomplaint damages from Bombardier Recreational Products Inc. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 3:50 am by Edith Roberts
” At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger observes that United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 6:57 pm by Katie Bart
“I greet most cordially members of the Supreme Court, including the chief justice of the United States. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 12:21 pm
Thus, to state a § 1983 claim, a plaintiff must allege two elements: (1) a deprivation of rights secured by the Constitution and laws of the United States, and (2) that `the deprivation was caused by a person acting under color of state law. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 10:53 pm by Josh Blackman
S. ___, ___ (2022) (slip op., at 5) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]