Search for: "Washington v. Hand" Results 3201 - 3220 of 3,643
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Dec 2007, 9:20 am
UPDATE:  The California Supreme Court's decision in Rico v. [read post]
4 Oct 2024, 5:50 am by Mary B. McCord
Editor’s note: This article is part of a new series from leading experts with practical solutions to democratic backsliding, polarization, and political violence. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
As a kicker, if they die without having sold the shares, the income embodied in those shares is never subject to income tax, even in the hands of lucky heirs who might sell the inherited shares right away.The Search for a Constitutional Bar to Taxing Unrealized IncomeBoth by definition and as a matter of substance over form, then, unrealized income is income and thus can be taxed under the Constitution. [read post]
18 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
That was the knock, of course, on the infamous (and thoroughly discredited) Bush v. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 6:23 pm by royblack
This week in Ashcroft v. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 9:29 am by ernst
  A Washington lawyer told AVCO that not only could Willebrandt handle the legal phases of the operation; she also had “the necessary contacts,” including her good friend Postmaster General Brown! [read post]
28 Dec 2019, 8:33 am
On top of social discontent, anger has also been directed at the Carabineros national police force, once one of the country’s most respected institutions but whose reputation has been eroded by corruption scandals and a reputation for brutality, whose heavy-handed repression of protests has also come under the spotlight. 3. [read post]
13 Oct 2022, 6:05 am by Joseph Margulies
Habib, who is Australian, had been one of the four petitioners in Rasul v. [read post]
17 Feb 2025, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  An “asymmetric” opinion, on the other hand, would generate only delighted winners and frightened losers. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 9:14 pm by Steven Calabresi
He did this in an op-ed in the Washington Post and then in a partisan speech that same day commemorating the 60th anniversary of the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. [read post]