Search for: "A & A Contracting, Inc." Results 3221 - 3240 of 25,482
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The decision also suggests that certain provisions of the UPCA that refer to Contracting States, including Art. 33(1) on claims against defendants outside the territory of the Contracting Member States, Art. 36 on financial contributions from the Contracting Member States, Art. 48(1) on Authorised Representatives, Art. 65 on revocation of patents, and Art. 83 on enforcement in Contracting Member States, will not in the future be interpreted to extend to countries… [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 10:23 am by Mark Theodore
In the meantime, the NLRB Division of Advice has answered a question that has been the subject of many charges since the Board’s decision in Alan Ritchey, Inc., 359 NLRB No. 40 (December 14, 2012), where it held that in cases where a union has recently secured representational rights, the employer has a duty to bargain over discretionary aspects of discipline before imposition until an initial contract is reached. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 10:49 am by Ian Patterson
In Volmar Construction, Inc., ASBCA No. 60710 (2016), the U.S. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 9:23 am by Gary Nitzkin
Sweebe, Inc. ruled that the four year Statute of Limitations under the Michigan Uniform Commercial Code that applies to Breach of Contract claims also applies to claims for Open Account when that account relates to the sale of goods. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 2:12 pm by William McGrath
A report on Monday, October 3 from Bloomberg Markets Magazine detailed a years-long scheme by Koch Industries, Inc. to make improper payments to win contracts in six countries – payments which the company admitted "constitute violations of criminal law. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 2:21 am by Scott A. McKeown
  Yet, the request for ex parte patent reexamination was not filed in October 2006, and the contract was terminated in October 2007. [read post]
24 May 2023, 3:55 pm by Keith Szeliga and Katie Calogero
Rather, the calculation of damages necessarily requires speculation regarding what price the parties would have negotiated if the data had been disclosed.[20] The Government has the burden to show “by some reasonable method” the amount it believes the final contract price was overstated.[21] There is a rebuttable presumption that the “natural and probable consequence” of defective cost or pricing data is a “dollar for dollar” increase in the… [read post]