Search for: "Black v. United States"
Results 3221 - 3240
of 4,858
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2012, 1:23 am
SCHWARTZ, Defendants.09-CV-2271(JS)(GRB) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 2012 U.S. [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 8:44 pm
Last Monday, the United States Supreme Court denied a writ of certiorari to review the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals’ ruling in McReynolds v. [read post]
9 Oct 2012, 2:31 pm
The plea agreement stated that the defendant agreed to waive "[a]ny right conferred by Title 18, United States Code, Section 3742 to appeal the sentence. [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 2:49 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 1:08 pm
Black, F. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 11:37 am
I have a similar bad faith fees issue currently pending in the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in the case of Tradesmen Int'l, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 1:39 pm
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
17 Sep 2012, 4:20 pm
Plessy v Ferguson in 1896 held that despite the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment, a state law requiring separate railroad cars for blacks and whites was constitutional as long as the cars were physically the same. [read post]
14 Sep 2012, 9:09 am
United States, from prior search and seizure cases, according to the petitioner, is the fact that police detained him after he had left the vicinity of the area covered by the search warrant. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 6:33 am
The Texas Attorney General’s announcement that the state will appeal a voter ID decision in Texas v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 10:06 pm
The Marine Corps completely excluded blacks until 1942. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 9:11 pm
Its text provides that “[a]ll persons born . . . in the United States” are by that fact alone “citizens of the United States” — and thus, equal citizens at birth. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 4:15 pm
In Batson v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 4:06 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 4:33 am
Forfeiture by wrongdoing in a principle in the common law that was first recognized by the United States Supreme Court in Reynolds v. [read post]
9 Sep 2012, 6:27 pm
So, let’s start at the very beginning: The statements in question do not implicate the Confrontation Clause of the United States Constitution. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 1:02 pm
Obama for America v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 8:20 am
Beginning with the famous case of Bolling v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 7:04 am
Vita-Mix loses an appeal to the CAFC:Vita-Mix Corporation (“Vita-Mix”) appeals from the district court’s final judgment in which the court con-cluded that Vita-Mix infringed the asserted claims of two United States patents, K-TEC, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 9:06 pm
In other states where it applies, only specific local units are covered. [read post]
