Search for: "Husband (S) v. Wife (S)"
Results 3221 - 3240
of 6,209
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2013, 5:55 am
Drawing an adverse inference, the trial judge concluded that the husband’s property available for distribution to the wife under the applicable statute was roughly $60 million. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 6:57 am
The Court of Appeals recently published Ohio County Hospital Corporation v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 9:20 am
In the case, May v. [read post]
5 Apr 2014, 6:30 pm
In Warren, a husband and wife co-owned a house destroyed by fire. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 11:31 am
It affirmed the family court’s finding that Husband’s premarital real estate wasn’t transmuted into marital property because: The parties never used the Antioch property as a marital home, never placed the property in Wife’s name, and Husband never made any substantial improvements to the property during the marriage. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 9:21 am
The parties in the case of Bierig-Kiejdan v. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 1:29 am
Thus, the tax penalties, interest and liabilities in question were not solely attributable to the husband. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 10:19 am
In the recent case of Ashmont v. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 10:19 am
In the recent case of Ashmont v. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 8:29 pm
Chisolm v. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 11:25 pm
In re Marriage of Miller (2015), an Illinois case, permitted the ex-Husband to introduce ex-Wife’s Facebook posts to show that she was cohabitating and “in a relationship” with someone new. [read post]
14 May 2009, 7:06 pm
The husband followed the trial court's opinion with an appeal. [read post]
5 May 2008, 2:36 pm
Loving last June, on the 40th anniversary of the Supreme Court's decision in Loving v. [read post]
1 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
A March 2003 matrimonial property order entitled the wife to a portion of the husband’s pension. [read post]
10 Dec 2011, 3:22 am
The District Judge's order was set aside and a retrial was directed. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 5:08 pm
Supreme Court of Florida: US v. [read post]
11 Feb 2017, 4:36 pm
The husband opposed the application whilst the wife was neutral and not represented at the anonymity hearing. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 11:14 am
In a 2002 case, Locke v. [read post]
7 Aug 2021, 11:46 am
This truism is amply displayed in the case of Y.Q. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 4:56 pm
See Berry v. [read post]
