Search for: "I v. B" Results 3221 - 3240 of 24,529
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Aug 2008, 1:09 pm
Furthermore, the rebuttable presumption will only exist with respect to an application that satisfies the conditions set forth in 37 CFR 1.78(f)(2)(i) and also has a filing date on or after this new effective date.The provisions of 37 CFR 1.17(f), 1.26(a) and (b), 1.52(d)(2), 1.53(b) and (c)(4), 1.75(b) and (c), 1.76(b)(5), 1.78, 1.104(a)(1) and (b), 1.110, 1.114(a) and (d), 1.136(a)(1), 1.142(a), 1.145, 1.495(g), and 1.704(c)(11) in effect as of… [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 5:29 pm by INFORRM
  He relied on the English decision in Woodward v Hutchins ([1977] 1 WLR 760). [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 6:45 am by Matt Bouchard
  Well, if the $4.8 billion (yes, that’s billion, with a “b”) expansion of I-35E in Texas is any indication, the sky’s the limit. [read post]
Louisiana First Circuit Court of Appeal again finds that it lacked jurisdiction over an appeal taken from a partial judgment that was not designated as final pursuant to Article 1915(B) of the Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure             In Constantin Land Trust v. [read post]
Louisiana First Circuit Court of Appeal again finds that it lacked jurisdiction over an appeal taken from a partial judgment that was not designated as final pursuant to Article 1915(B) of the Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure             In Constantin Land Trust v. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 5:50 am
How long should I wait for this guy before I give up? [read post]