Search for: "In Matter of Johnson*" Results 3221 - 3240 of 6,855
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2015, 5:54 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
Or, for that matter, that any state agency be required to hire any ex-offender. [read post]
14 May 2015, 3:29 pm by Lorene Park
Disagreeing with Member Johnson’s partial dissent, the majority did not view the use of profanity to be qualitatively different from other profanity regularly tolerated by the employer (Pier Sixty, LLC). [read post]
13 May 2015, 2:09 am by Giles Peaker
Hotak (Appellant) v London Borough of Southwark (Respondent) Kanu (Appellant) v London Borough of Southwark (Respondent) Johnson (Appellant) v Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council (Respondent)Crisis & Shelter, EHRC, SS for CLG interveners [2015] UKSC 30 The thing about the Supreme Court is that all those years of accrued, encrusted High Court and Court of Appeal case law just don’t matter. [read post]
12 May 2015, 9:07 pm by John Mesirow
The Court of Special Appeals held that the entire incident described above be considered as only one episode of contempt, and sent the matter back to the trial judge on that one count of contempt, with the not-so-subtle hint that they “leave it to his judgment what further action should be taken. [read post]
11 May 2015, 5:58 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Johnson Okpaluba contributes a chapter on digital sampling, arguing that licensing was prevalent in the US music industry even before litigation established a rule of “get a license or don’t sample. [read post]
8 May 2015, 7:00 am by Jocelyn Hutton
On Wednesday the Court will also hear the appeal In the matter of AR (Children) (Scotland) regarding proceedings under the Child Abduction and Custody Act 1985 to secure the return of the appellant’s children from Scotland to France, where he was resident. [read post]
5 May 2015, 8:27 am
The parent company and manufacturers that produce Children's Motrin immediately filed an appeal, alleging they should have received a judgment as a matter of law due to pre-emption by the federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) laws, an unqualified expert witness for the injured child, and grossly excessive awards that were unsupported by the record. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 1:11 pm
  Defendants argued that (1) they were entitled to judgment as a matter of law because plaintiffs’ warnings claim was preempted, under principles of implied conflict preemption; and 2) plaintiffs failed to prove causation because their causation expert was unqualified to render his causation opinions. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 4:07 pm by Lax & Neville LLP
CFP Board investigations can be triggered by customer arbitrations, criminal matters, regulatory actions by the SEC, CFTC, FINRA and state regulators, bankruptcies, employment terminations, requests from other financial advisors with the CFP designation and anonymous tips. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 1:38 pm by James E. Novak, P.L.L.C.
  The court held that it did not matter whether a drug K-9 check was conducted prior to, or following the issuance of a citation. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 1:38 pm by James E. Novak, P.L.L.C.
  The court held that it did not matter whether a drug K-9 check was conducted prior to, or following the issuance of a citation. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 11:12 am by Kyle Green
In its decision, the court held, “that a police stop exceeding the time needed to handle the matter for which the stop was made violates the Constitution’s shield against unreasonable seizure. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 11:12 am by Kyle Green
In its decision, the court held, “that a police stop exceeding the time needed to handle the matter for which the stop was made violates the Constitution’s shield against unreasonable seizure. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 7:46 pm
Johnson called in attorney Abe Fortas to seek the one outcome that mattered: get the injunction overturned, fast.Fortas devised an unconventional, but brilliant strategy – the only one that could work in the time available. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 1:34 pm by Richard M. Re
” John Bash (Art Lien) Justice Samuel Alito soon introduced another important theme that would last the rest of the argument: “As a practical matter[,] how much difference does it make whether there’s a purely objective standard or a subjective standard? [read post]