Search for: "In Re: Mark M."
Results 3221 - 3240
of 7,664
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Oct 2014, 12:29 am
This should also serve as a stark warning to others that we’re committed to bringing fraudsters to justice. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 1:02 pm
That way, you can see whether you made any mistakes and, if so, fix them within the code, rather than having to delete the code and re-mark the cite. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 1:02 pm
That way, you can see whether you made any mistakes and, if so, fix them within the code, rather than having to delete the code and re-mark the cite. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 6:35 am
To be clear, I’m absolutely not suggesting that tweets should be cleared through legal – they shouldn’t. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 5:53 am
In re LAMB-GRS, LLC, Serial No. 77756492 (September 30, 2014) [not precedential].The test for determining whether a mark is deceptive under Section 2(a) has been articulated in Budge as: (1) Is the term misdescriptive of the character, quality, function, composition or use of the goods? [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 5:00 am
That's not the morning coffee you're feeling. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 6:52 am
”) So I’m all biased up, because I’m predisposed to liking this work, having always done so, and because I got a free new review copy of the 6th Edition because Siegrun asked them to send it to me. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 4:48 pm
"And when the leaves begin to fall/Answering old winter's call/I feel my tears, they fall like rain/Weeping forth the sad refrain/Blue, dark, and dim it may seem/You mark a grin, a moonbeam/Brightens your smile, pray tell me/How all the while you can be/So mystifyingly glad/I'm Mr. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 2:22 pm
At the risk of being a little too Brooklyn, I’m going to be blunt. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 6:56 am
KEE: I’m not –THE CHAIRPERSON: Well, you’re able to tell me you have information on where that audio-visual content is being posted; is that correct? [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 10:05 pm
Rev. 1345 (2004)4195Frischman, Brett M.; Lemley, Mark A.Spillovers [comments] 107 Colum. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 2:54 pm
In reported speech, to mark a person addressed. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 12:52 am
Today, I’m sounding the alarm. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 3:39 pm
I’m just going off of what the news has reported. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 7:30 am
And yeah, I’m not going to dispute the fact that they are limited. [read post]
21 Sep 2014, 9:45 am
"They're beheading journalists. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 11:07 am
The upshot of the practice of marking decisions non-precedential is that judges are permitted to decide like cases differently solely because the earlier judges decided to keep their decisions “private. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 12:46 pm
Look at the world we’re in at this very moment. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 9:34 am
If you’re not working on a lease, this issue might give you some pause about doing a clearance search with an attorney before using a mark. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 5:22 am
The police may say, “we’re intensively policing this neighborhood because it had 10% more crime in the past. [read post]
