Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)"
Results 3221 - 3240
of 21,111
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2013, 10:16 am
The defendant Jeffrey S. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 7:02 am
”1 North Carolina’s Courts have applied that same standard to insurance brokers. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 4:17 am
After the jury found defendant A10 Networks ("A10") liable for misappropriation of trade secrets and infringement of patents owned by Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. et al ("Brocade"), the court entered two permanent injunctions against A10, one that prohibited additional patent infringement and another that applied to the misappropriation of trade secrets. [read post]
18 May 2017, 1:20 pm
Who's the proper party where the decedent was protected by the insurance? [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 9:00 am
On May 7, 2024, the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey denied Defendant ISP Environmental Service Inc. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 7:02 am
”1 North Carolina’s Courts have applied that same standard to insurance brokers. [read post]
17 May 2023, 2:00 am
Interestingly, of the three straps that R.H. had purchased for the installation, one broke when he tested it.Once the installation was complete, while M.D. was testing the platform, the ratchet broke, causing him to fall to the ground and sustain injuries, thus leading to the litigation.After the defendants were found liable for negligence, they appealed to the Appellate Division, Fourth Department, which didn’t buy their “recreational use,” or “intervening… [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 11:00 pm
Amber Alsteen and 69 other plaintiffs (collectively, “Alsteen”) alleged the defendants were liable for the release of a chemical preservative called “Penta” into a residential neighborhood in Wausau, Wisconsin from 1946 to 1986. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 9:00 am
The defendants (Chevron Corp., et al.) removed the case to federal court. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 11:00 pm
Amber Alsteen and 69 other plaintiffs (collectively, “Alsteen”) alleged the defendants were liable for the release of a chemical preservative called “Penta” into a residential neighborhood in Wausau, Wisconsin from 1946 to 1986. [read post]
19 Jan 2013, 6:15 am
(v) Sony and the other defendants clearly adapted the plaintiff’s photograph without permission, but they adapted un-original parts on the one hand and copied too little of the original parts on the other." [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 6:00 am
The court granted the parent company’s motion to dismiss. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 3:03 pm
In the lawsuit, Hermès alleged that defendant Mason Rothschild’s MetaBirkins NFTs infringed and diluted Hermès’ trademark rights in the Birkin word mark and design. [read post]
5 May 2014, 7:55 am
” Justice Breyer acknowledges that the defendant is liable only for losses “proximately” caused by the defendant’s misconduct. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 1:01 pm
The Court agreed that court clerks could be held liable in negligence for breaches of purely ministerial duties. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 10:28 am
Since the EMS Act applied to the defendants, the negligence suit was barred. [read post]
29 Sep 2022, 9:29 am
In other words, the defendant may be liable for damages resulting from the injury even if its subcontractor was negligent. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 1:14 am
Accordingly, the Ghadamis argued, they could not be liable to pay any of Cole's costs which were in excess of £1,000. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 6:25 pm
The unevenness of the sidewalk was found to be only a trivial matter and does not hold the defendants liable for damages. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 4:08 pm
The unevenness of the sidewalk was found to be only a trivial matter and does not hold the defendants liable for damages. [read post]